P.VELMURUGAN
R. Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State represented by its The Inspector of Police, Nedungadu Police Station – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This Criminal Appeal has been filed seeking to call for the records in Special Sessions Case No.6 of 2017 on the file of the learned Special Judge at Karaikal, and set aside the judgment dated 28.02.2019.
2. The respondent police registered the case against the appellant in Crime No.8 of 2016 for the offence punishable under section 8 of POCSO Act. After completing the investigation, laid a charge sheet before the Special Judge, Karaikal. The learned Special Judge taken the case in Spl.S.C.No.6 of 2017. After completing the formalities, the learned Special judge framed a charge against the appellant for the offence under section 8 of POCSO Act. After framing the charge during the trial, on the side of the prosecution, the prosecution examined as many as 10 witnesses as P.W.1 to 10 and 13 documents were marked as Ex.P.1 to 13, besides 8 material objects were exhibited. After completing the examination of the prosecution witnesses, incriminating circumstances culled out from the evidence of the prosecution witnesses were put before the appellant by questioning under section 313 of Cr.P.C., and he denied it as false and pleaded not guilty. On the side of the defence, no oral
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.