PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Southern Railway – Appellant
Versus
Uday Singh Meena – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
The above appeal is preferred by the Railway Protection Force, as an employer aggrieved by the order passed by the learned single Judge dated 21.09.2020 made in W.P. No.10078 of 2013, quashing the order of termination of services of the respondent herein dated 10.10.2012.
2. The respondent herein had applied for the selection conducted by the Appellants Force for the post of Sub Inspector in Railway Protection Force (RPF). The respondent qualified in the physical endurance test, written test, interview and also the medical test on 09.04.2009. He was also sent for the training for the post of Sub Inspector at the RPF Academy, Kharagpur. After completion of the training on 10.06.2010, he was appointed as a temporary Sub Inspector at RPF at Trichirapalli with effect from 22.04.2010. He was put on probation for two years.
3. On 29.07.2011, the respondent was directed to undergo training in Weapon and Tactics course and also for medical examination. He was examined by the Medical Board of Railways on 09.12.2011. On 10.02.2012 he was found not fit for the post of Sub Inspector in RPF in BEE One category as glasses were not permitted for RPF for such categ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.