T.RAVINDRAN
Durairaj – Appellant
Versus
Philip – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
T. Ravindran, J.
1. Challenge in this Second Appeal is made to the judgment and decree dated 16.10.2015 passed in A.S. No. 36 of 2014 on the file of the Additional District Sessions Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ariyalur, reversing the judgment and decree dated 30.08.2013 passed in O.S. No. 46 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Jayamkondam.
2. The second appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law:
(b) Whether in Law is not the Lower Appellate Court wrong in granting decree for declaration of Easementary Right by prescription as prayed for by holding that the Appellant/Plaintiff is entitled for Easementary Right by necessity which is not prayed for?
(c) Is not the judgment of the Lower Appellate Court vitiated in that it has failed to consider Exs. B3 to B5 which clearly show that there is no reference to the existence of Cart Track in the prior title deeds?
3. Considering the scope of the issues involved between the partie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.