R.SUBRAMANIAN
Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
Vetrivelan – Respondent
ORDER :
R. Subramanian, J.
1. This revision raises an interesting question as to the Court fee payable in an appeal against an order determining the share of the income from the properties to be divided between the parties in a suit for partition.
2. The suit in O.S. No. 493 of 1993 was filed by one Palaniandi and the respondents 1 and 2 herein. Since Palaniandi died after the suit, his legal representatives were brought on record and arrayed as respondents 3 to 6 herein. A preliminary decree came to be passed by the Trial Court on 26.10.1998. An appeal was taken there from to this Court in A.S. No. 861 of 1998, which came to be disposed of on 22.09.2008. Thereafter, the plaintiffs in the suit filed an application in I.A. No. 172 of 2010 seeking determination of the income from the suit properties. The application came to be filed under Order 20 Rule 12 of C.P.C.
3. The learned Principal Sub-Ordinate Judge, Cuddalore by an order dated 12.01.2016 fixed the income from the suit properties, which resulted in a direction to the petitioner herein to pay a sum of Rs. 1,00,19,890/- with subsequent interest at 6% per annum from the date of the suit till date of realization. Aggrieved by this f
Abu and Others Vs. Thithikutty Umma and others
Basavayya Vs. Guruvayya (AIR 1951 Mad. 938 FB)
D. Nataraja Achari Vs. Balambal Ammal
In re Dhanukodi Nayakkar and others
Karuppanna Gounder Vs. Sennimalai Gounder
Nataraja Achari Vs. Balambal Ammal
P. Ponnammal and others Vs. Kanakavalli Srinivasan and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.