Jebaraj vs State - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 3341

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Mad) 3341

P.N.PRAKASH, B.PUGALENDHI
Jebaraj – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : G. Karuppasamy Pandian, S. Ravi.
For the Respondent: M. Chandrasekaran.

JUDGMENT :

B. PUGALENDHI, J.

1. These appeals are directed against the conviction and sentence ordered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2, Thoothukudi, in S.C. No. 171 of 2011, dated 30.11.2011.

2. The trial Court has framed charges against the accused under Sections 302 and 397 IPC and after full fledged trial, found them guilty, convicted and sentenced them as detailed below:

Accused	Section of Law	Sentence of imprisonment	Fine Amount
A1 & A2	302 IPC	To undergo imprisonment for life.	Rs. 500/- each, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.
A1 & A2	397 IPC	To undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years.	Rs. 100/- each, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.

3. The appellant in Crl. A. (MD) No. 290 of 2017 is the first accused and the appellant in Crl. A. (MD) No. 167 of 2019 is the second accused. When Crl. A. (MD) No. 290 of 2017 came up for hearing on 09.04.2019, it was brought to the knowledge of this Court that the second accused has not filed any appeal challenging the judgment o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(Mad) 3341

P.N.PRAKASH, B.PUGALENDHIJebaraj – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

P.N.PRAKASH, B.PUGALENDHI
Jebaraj – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent