P.T.ASHA
Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Cipla Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.T. Asha, J.
1. The applicant is the plaintiff before this Court. Since the facts relating to all the applications are analogous a composite order is being pronounced in the above matters. The applicant herein has filed a suit for various reliefs detailed in the plaint.
2. Pending the suit the applicant has moved the following interlocutory applications:
(b) O.A. No. 73 of 2020: To grant ad-interim injunction restraining the Defendant, its directors, principals, proprietor, partners, officers, employees, agents, distributors, franchisees, representatives and assigns from using the depiction of the Plaintiff's product or any other product deceptively similar to that of the Plaintiff's in its advertisement or in any other manner disparaging the
Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.
Dabur India Ltd. vs. Colgate Palmolive India Ltd.
Dabur India Ltd. vs. Colortek Meghalaya Pvt. Ltd.
Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd.
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.