R.SUBRAMANIAN
Kanniappan – Appellant
Versus
Yousuff Sait – Respondent
ORDER :
R. Subramanian, J.
1. Challenge in this revision by the legal representatives of the defendants in O.S. No. 104 of 1977 is to the order of the learned District Munsif at Coonoor, allowing the execution petition in E.P. No. 10 of 2018 filed by the decree holder seeking possession of the property subject matter of the said suit.
2. The suit in O.S. No. 104 of 1977 was laid by the respondent seeking specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 14.07.1975 entered into between the predecessors in interest of the petitioners and the first respondent herein. The said suit came to be decreed after contest on 27.07.1978. An appeal was taken there from to this Court in A.S. No. 46 of 1979, which was also dismissed. Further letters patent appeal in LPA. No. 29 of 1986 by the defendants in O.S. No. 104 of 1977 also came to be dismissed on 30.11.1989. There were no further proceedings and the judgment and decree in the suit became final. The decree holder/first respondent filed an execution petition in E.P. No. 51 of 1991 on the file of the District Court, Ootacamund, which was subsequently transferred to Sub-Court, Ootacamund and numbered as E.P. No. 10 of 1995. Again, the same was
Mr. V. Raghavachari. In Babulal. Vs. Rajkumar reported in 1996 3 SCC 154
Bhanwari Lal Vs. Satyanarain and another reported in (1995) 1 SCC 6
Excell Dealcomm Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asset Reconstruction Co (India) Ltd. Reported in 2015 (8) SCC 219
Babu Lal Vs. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal reported in AIR 1982 SC 818
Vasanthi Vs. Manickam reported in 2017 3 CTC 729
S. Sampoornam and Another Vs. P.V. Kuppuswamy and Others reported in 2007 (3) CTC 529
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.