P.N.PRAKASH, V.SIVAGNANAM
M. Suresh Khatri – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
ORDER :
P.N. Prakash, J.
1. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to by their names.
2. On a complaint lodged by the General Manager, State Bank of India (SBI), Chennai, the CBI registered an FIR in Crime No. RC.05/E/2018/CBI/BS&FC/BLR on 21.03.2018 for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC read with Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, against M/s. Kanishk Gold Pvt. Ltd. (in short "KGPL"), Chennai and five named accused. The sum and substance of the allegations in the FIR is that, during 2011, a consortium of 14 banks with SBI as the lead bank, had sanctioned working capital credit facilities which KGPL (A1) had allegedly diverted, resulting in loss to the banks to the tune of Rs. 824.15crores as on 31.12.2017. Since the FIR disclosed the commission of a 'schedule offence' under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (in short "the PML Act"), the Enforcement Directorate registered a case in ECIR No. CEZO-I/07/2018 on 22.03.2018, conducted investigation under the PML Act, collected materials and filed a complaint in C.C. No. 13 of 2018 in the Court of the Principal Sessions Judge (Special Court), Chenna
Bhushan Kumar and another Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and another
Dy. Chief Controller of Imports & Exports Vs. Roshanlal Agarwal and others (2003) 4 SCC 139
Jagdish Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and another
Kanti Bhadra Shah and another Vs. State of West Bengal
Mehmood Ul Rehman Vs. Khazir Mohammad Tunda and Others
Radheshyam Kejriwal Vs. State of West Bengal and Another
U.P. Pollution Control Board Vs. Mohan Meakins Ltd. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.