JUDGMENT :

T. Raja, J.

1. This appeal has been directed against the impugned judgment and decree dated 30.06.2011 decreeing the money suit against the appellant defendant directing him to pay a sum of Rs. 17,78,000/- together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the principal sum of Rs. 14,00,000/- from the date of plaint till the date of decree.

2. Mr. S. Parthasarathy, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant defendant, assailing the impugned judgment, pleaded that the Trial Court has committed error in coming to the conclusion that the appellant defendant has admitted the execution of the document and the borrowal. Based on such erroneous conclusion, the Trial Court has completely lost sight of the evidence of DW1, the appellant herein, who had categorically denied the execution of 14 promissory notes on 05.07.2000 and also borrowal of Rs. 14,00,000/-.

2.1. Arguing further, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that when the appellant defendant has made a specific case before the Trial Court that he has not borrowed Rs. 14,00,000/- on 05.07.2000 and not even executed 14 promissory notes, the Trial Court overlooking the facts as to what happen