SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1543

R.SUBRAMANIAN
Syed Mathani – Appellant
Versus
N. M. Shahul Hameed – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : J. Maria Roseline
For the Respondent: T.S. Mohamed Mohideen

ORDER :

R. Subramanian, J.

1. This revision is directed against the order of the Wakf Tribunal in Wakf O.P. No. 09 of 2003. The said Wakf O.P was filed by the petitioners herein seeking the following reliefs:

    (a) that the succession to the office of muthawalli in respect of the west chinthamani mosque, Trichy is hereditary

(b) that the appointment of the muthawallis shall be from the descendants of Rustum Bi

(c) that the petitioners are qualified to be appointed as committee members to conduct the affairs of the mosque.

(d) that the deed executed by the wakf Rustum Bi on 03.08.1881 is a Wakf deed dealing with the line of succession for the office of Muthawalliship as also concerning the administration of the mosque and the wakf

(e) and, as such, the appointment of the petitioners as committee members is legal and valid

(f) for costs of petition

2. According to the petitioners, they are descendants of the Wakif Rustum Bi, who has created a Wakf Deed dated 03.06.1881 dedicating certain properties to Chinthamani Mosque constructed by her. According to the petitioners, the said deed also p

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top