SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1506

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. Kirubakaran, Abdul Quddhose, JJ.
Settu – Appellant
Versus
Reshma Sulthana – Respondent
C.M.A. No. 2192 of 2017
Decided On : 30-03-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P. Paramasivadoss
For the Amicus Curiae : Ajmal Khan, Senior Counsel

Headnote:

Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act - Sections 2(8) and 2(viii)(a) - Family Courts Act - Section 7(1)(b) - Dissolution of Muslim Marriage - Dismissal of divorce - Decree of divorce or dissolution of marriage - Appeal has been preferred by the Husband against the dismissal of his petition filed for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent under Section 2(8) of Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act by the Family Court - Appellant got married the respondent - Bangalore and out of the wedlock, two children were born to the couple - Appellant was working at Qatar and out of his earnings, he had purchased a house property at Bangalore in which the respondent was living with their children. When things stand so, the appellant came to know through his daughter that the respondent was having many boyfriends and leading a wayward - Appellant/husband, the respondent continued her relationship with her boyfriends - Left with no other option, appellant returned to India. However, to his shock and surprise - respondent got married their daughter, who was a minor then, to a person who was a tenant in appellant's premises without the knowledge of the appellant – Held, Government has come out with an Act called "The Muslim Women said Act, pronouncement of triple talaq at a time has been prohibited and made criminal offence - Pronouncement of triple talaq should be as per the religious practices by giving notice and thereafter by arbitration by two persons in presence of Khazi and on failure only, talaq would take effect as per muslim religious practices - Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 was enacted by British India regime as colonial legislation to safeguard the interest of the women - Perception of understanding of life and religious practices on personal laws got changed and many muslim men are approaching the Court for dissolution of marriage as in present case on hand - Religious practices, people should have additional forum through Court - Decree of divorce or dissolution of marriage - Decree of divorce or dissolution of marriage by coming to Court, he should have the support of the statute - Government should encourage people coming to the Court for dissolution of marriage especially Muslim men - Getting relief through Court is in addition to the procedure laid down as per religious practices - Traditional barriers can be broken only by allowing the muslim men to approach the Court - Appeal stands allowed

JUDGMENT :

1. The appeal has been preferred by the Husband against the dismissal of his petition filed for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent under Section 2(8) of Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act by the Family Court. The appellant got married the respondent on 13.08.1998 at Bangalore and out of the wedlock, two children were born to the couple. The appellant was working at Qatar and out of his earnings, he had purchased a house property at Bangalore in which the respondent was living with their children. When things stand so, the appellant came to know through his daughter that the respondent was having many boyfriends and leading a wayward, illegal and immoral life. Inspite of the warnings given by the appellant/husband, the respondent continued her relationship with her boyfriends. Left with no other option, the appellant returned to India. However, to his shock and surprise, the respondent got married their daughter, who was a minor then, to a person who was a tenant in the appellant's premises without the knowledge of the appellant. In this regard, a police complaint was also given.

2. Thereafter, the appellant brought his son to his native Harur and admitted him in the local school. As the best efforts taken by the appellant to get reunited with the respondent proved to be futile and the request made to the family members of the respondent did not yield expected results, the appellant issued a notice dated 22.04.2016 through the Government Khazi, Dharmapuri asking his wife to come and live with him.

3. Inspite of receiving the said notice, neither the respondent got reunited with the appellant nor sent a reply to the said notice. Therefore, as per muslim religious customs, first talaq notice was issued on 05.05.2016. As no reply was received for the said notice from the side of the respondent, second and third talaq notices were issued 04.06.2016 and 12.07.2016 respectively calling for the respondent to appear before the Government Khazi, Dharmapuri. Since the respondent was able to evade receipt of notice, the Government Khazi, Dharmapuri issued the talaq certificate on 15.09.2016. On receipt of the said certificate, the appellant/husband approached the Family Court at Dharmapuri and filed a petition for divorce under Section 2(viii)(a) of Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939. Though summons in the said OP was served on the respondent, she remained ex-parte. After examining the appellant/husband and marking the documents Ex. P.1 to P.9, the learned Family Judge dismissed the petition on the ground that the petition is not maintainable by the Husband under the provisions of Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 and only the muslim women married under the muslim law is having the right to get the marriage dissolved under the said Act. The said dismissal of divorce petition filed by the appellant/husband is being challenged before this Court by way of this appeal.

4. Even though notices was sent to the respondent in this Appeal, the same was refused to be received by the respondent and therefore, this Court took the refusal as sufficient service of notice on the respondent. Since the issue regarding the right of the Husband to invoke the provisions of Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 to dissolve the marriage arose in this appeal, this Court requested Mr. Ajmal Khan, learned Senior Counsel to assist this Court as Amicus Curiae.

5. Heard Mr. P. Paramasivadoss, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Ajmal Khan, learned Amicus Curiae.

6. Mr. P. Paramasivadoss, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the petition is maintainable before the Family Court and the provisions of Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 can be invoked to dissolve the marriage. The right available to the muslim women under the said Act is equally applicable to the Husband and hence, the learned counsel for the appellant would seek to allow the appeal.

7. Mr. Ajmal Khan, learned Senior Counsel and Amicus Curiae

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top