SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1346

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
A. Priya – Appellant
Versus
Sathishkuttan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :K. Sudhakar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M. Arun, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 03.02.2016 made in MCOP.No.232 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Sub Court, Sathiyamangalam.)

(Heard through video conferencing)

1. This civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 03.02.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Sub Court, Sathiyamangalam) in MCOP.No.232 of 2014.

2. Heard Mr.K.Sudhakar, learned counsel for the Appellants and Mr.M.Arun, learned counsel for the second respondent. Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the first respondent, notice to the first respondent is dispensed with by this Court.

3. The Appellants/claimants unsatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal have preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement. The Tribunal under the impugned award directed the second respondent Transport Corporation to pay a compensation of Rs.5,36,000/- to the Appellants a

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top