SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1427

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
K. Dhanush – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Chennai & Others – Respondents
WP. No. 33800 of 2015
Decided on : 05-08-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :S. Vijayan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:V. Veluchamy, Government Advocate.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 226, 141 , 21 and 51A - Whether or not the Government should exercise such power - Whether a citizen filing the writ petition is bound to state about his identity including his profession and other particulars, or not - Petitioner states that he has purchased one ROLLS ROYCE GHOST FK42 RHD, Diamond Colour car of United Kingdom origin and port of loading was London - Vehicle has been manufactured by Rolls Royce Motor Cars Limited and price of vehicle and the petitioner has paid customs duty - Petitioner approached 3rd respondent for the purpose of new registration of the imported vehicle and the 3rd respondent insisted the petitioner to submit 'Entry Tax Clearance Certificate' to be obtained from the 2nd respondent - When the petitioner approached the office of the 2nd respondent, 2nd respondent insisted payment of Entry Tax in respect of the imported vehicle - Petitioner states that he has paid the customs duty and therefore, no further tax is to be levied - Neither Sales Tax nor Entry Tax is levied for vehicles that are imported - Contention of petitioner is that, the goods that are manufactured in India suffers payment of Excise Duty and the goods that are imported suffers Customs Duty – Held, Court is of considered view that it is the constitutional duty of the High Court to contribute for the development of the constitutional principles as the Indian Constitution is not a mere law but a visionary document - 'Obiter dicta' offered in various judgments become law for the purpose of development and to make the constitutional rights more vibrant to reach the constitutional goals - Petitioner made a submission that the petitioner is willing to withdraw the writ petition - Court has to consider the circumstances and conduct of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in order to avoid such unwarranted circumstances as well as to avoid unnecessary multiplicity of litigations in future - Court though fit to pass orders, making the citizen aware - writ petition stands disposed of

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent and their subordinates from demanding or collecting Entry Tax in respect of the petitioner Imported ROLLS ROYCE GHOST FK42 RHD, Diamond Colour vide bearing Chassis No.SCA664S0XFUH18471, Enginer No.90311169 for the purpose of assignment of new registration mark by the 3rd respondent herein.)

1. The writ on hand is filed to issue a mandamus forbearing the respondents and their subordinates from demanding or collecting Entry Tax in respect of the petitioner's Imported ROLLS ROYCE GHOST FK42 RHD, Diamond Colour vide bearing Chassis No.SCA664S0XFUH18471, Engine No.90311169 for the purpose of assignment of new registration mark by the 3rd respondent.

Facts of the case:

2. The petitioner states that he has purchased one ROLLS ROYCE GHOST FK42 RHD, Diamond Colour car of United Kingdom origin and the port of loading was London. The vehicle has been manufactured by Rolls Royce Motor Cars Limited and the price of the vehicle is Rs.2,15,26,563/- and the petitioner has paid customs duty of Rs.2,69,79,860/-. The petitioner approached the 3rd respondent for the purpose of new registration of the imported vehicle and the 3rd respondent insisted the petitioner to submit 'Entry Tax Clearance Certificate' to be obtained from the 2nd respondent. When the petitioner approached the office of the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent insisted payment of Entry Tax in respect of the imported vehicle.

3. The petitioner states that he has paid the customs duty and therefore, no further tax is to be levied. Neither Sales Tax nor Entry Tax is levied for vehicles that are imported. The contention of the petitioner is that, the goods that are manufactured in India suffers payment of Excise Duty and the goods that are imported suffers Customs Duty. By questioning the levy of Entry Tax, the petitioner has prayed for an injunction restraining the respondents from collecting the Entry Tax in respect of the imported vehicle.

4. The issue raised in the present writ petition is no more res integra. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Kerala v. Fr.William Fernandez, reported in [2018] 57 GSTR 6 (SC), has held as follows:

    “No court can compel the Government to exercise its power to examine or for that matter to grant administrative waiver. It is a policy decision to be taken by the Government and it is not for the Court to dictate as to whether or not the Government should exercise such power. The law on the subject as decided by this Court as early as September 1, 1999 holds that the entry tax is leviable on imported vehicles. Therefore, the submission that the matter should be relegated to the Government for grant of administrative waiver is not tenable.”

5. The said judgment was followed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of V.Krishnamurthy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others, reported in [2019] 69 GSTR 326 (Mad).

Discussion:

6. The rich affluent and reputed persons are importing vehicle from other countries. The writ petitions are filed seeking injunction forbearing the respondents from demanding Entry Tax by the State. By virtue of interim orders passed in the writ petitions, they have registered the vehicle and plying the same using the roads within the State of Tamil Nadu. However, the Entry Taxes are not paid so far and thus, the relevance and importance are to be considered by this Court.

7. Large number of writ petitions are filed. Some of the writ petitions were disposed of and other writ petitions are kept pending on various reasons, including the reason that the said cases are not listed by the High Court.

8. Undoubtedly, the State suffers huge revenue loss for many number of years, as these tax dues are not collected on account of the interim orders granted and due to pendency of the writ petitions.

9. Every citizen of this great nation has a right to seek constit

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top