SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1371

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Kannan – Appellant
Versus
Subramani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :S. Sankar, Advocate.
For the Respondents:D. Bhaskaran, S. Arunkumar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the Judgment and Decree passed in MCOP.No.28 of 2014 dated 09.02.2016 on the file of MACT/Additional District Court at Namakkal.)

(This case is heard through Video Conferencing)

1. This civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 09.02.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge, Namakkal) in MCOP.No.28 of 2004.

2. The Appellant/claimant unsatisfied with the quantum of compensation by the Tribunal under the impugned award has preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement.

3. The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award are as follows :

Heads

Award Amount (Rs.)

Disability

40,000/-

Medical bills

3,35,055/-

Loss of amenities

10,000/-

Pain and suffering

10,000/-

Extra nourishment

5,000/-

Attender charges

5,000/-

Total

4,05,055/-

Rounded off to

4,05,100/-

4. The Appellant/claimant sustaine

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top