Prakash vs State Rep. by its the Inspector of Police, Ammapettai Police Station

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1391

P.N.PRAKASH, R.N.MANJULA
Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by its the Inspector of Police, Ammapettai Police Station – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Manoharan.
For the Respondent: M. Babu Muthu Meeran.

JUDGMENT :

R.N. MANJULA, J.

Prayer: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 19.12.2012 in S.C. No. 150 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Erode.

1. This Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellant/accused to set aside the conviction and sentence made in S.C. No. 150 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Erode dated 19.12.2012, as tabulated hereunder:

Rank of the accused	Provision under which convicted	Sentence
A1	Section 302 IPC	Life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default to undergo three years simple imprisonment.
A1	Section 449 IPC	Seven years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 2,000/- in default to undergo one year simple imprisonment

2. The short facts of the prosecution case are as follows:

The appellant/Accused is a resident of the Indira Colony, Konamookanur, Poonachi, Bhavani. The wife of the accused had suspicion on the conduct of the deceased Kanaka that she had an illegal intimacy with her husband. Because of this, on 31

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1391

P.N.PRAKASH, R.N.MANJULAPrakash – AppellantVersusState Rep. by its the Inspector of Police, Ammapettai Police Station – Respondent

P.N.PRAKASH, R.N.MANJULA
Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by its the Inspector of Police, Ammapettai Police Station – Respondent