S. Muthusamy vs K. Ramalingam - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 1381

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1381

C.SARAVANAN
S. Muthusamy – Appellant
Versus
K. Ramalingam – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.S. Balaji.
For the Respondent: C. Veeraraghavan.

JUDGMENT :

C. SARAVANAN, J.

Prayer: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, against the Judgments and Decrees dated 18.08.2011 passed by the Subordinate Court, Pollachi in A.S. Nos. 32 and 33 of 2010 confirming the Judgments and Decrees dated 05.07.2010 passed by the District Munsif Court, Pollachi in O.S. No. 294 of 2002 and O.S. No. 490 of 2007.

1. By this common Judgment, both the Second Appeals are being disposed.

2. At the time of admission of these Second Appeals, the following substantial questions of law have been framed for being answered:

S.A. No. 81 of 2016	S.A. No. 82 of 2016
Whether the Courts below is right in coming to the conclusion and following the suit filed by the first respondent when it clearly established that there is encroachment by the first respondent in the appellant?	Whether the Lower Appellate Court is right in dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant on the point of limitation, while coming to conclusion that the finding of the trial court is not correct?

3. These Second Appeals have

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1381

C.SARAVANANS. Muthusamy – AppellantVersusK. Ramalingam – Respondent

C.SARAVANAN
S. Muthusamy – Appellant
Versus
K. Ramalingam – Respondent