SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1743

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S. Prabhu – Appellant
Versus
K. Chettiyappan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :M/s. C. Thangaraju, Advocate.
For the Respondent:J. Chandran, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to enhance the compensation awarded in the judgment and decree dated 15.04.2019 passed in M.C.O.P. No.685 of 2017 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Special Subordinate Judge No.2, Salem.)

(Heard video conference)

1. Mr. J.Chandran, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat on behalf of the 2nd respondent/Insurance Company.

This appeal has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 15.04.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Subordinate Judge No.2, Salem) in M.C.O.P.No.685 of 2017.

2. The appellant/claimant unsatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award has preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement.

3. The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award are as follows:

Heads

Amount awarded by the Tribunal (Rs.)

Functional disabilityRs.6,500 x 12 = 40% x 18 = 19,65,600 x 3.33%

65454

Pain and sufferings

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top