SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1863

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. PARTHIBAN, J.
Pritha Ratnam - Applicant
Versus
V. Saravanan & Another - Respondents
A. No. 1409 of 2021 in C.S. No. 284 of 2020
Decided On : 09-09-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : George Cheriyan.
For the Respondents: P.L. Narayanan.

Headnote:

Civil Procedure Code,1908 - Order XXXVIII Rule 6 - Order XIV Rule 8- Order of attachment of immovable property - Sale agreement - Total consideration fixed for sale of subject property - Evincing interest in schedule property she appeared to have expressed her inclination for buying property through outright sale - While the decision was taken to purchase property plaintiff also appeared to have expressed her reservation in regard to a discrepancy in extent of land which is shown in sale deed as grounds and but extent shown in patta was only having a short fall of patta - According to plaintiff defendants volunteered to rectify error and discrepancy in the patta and on basis of the assurance plaintiff entered into a sale agreement on - Held, This Court also does not appreciate that on one hand respondents/ defendants would not file an affidavit in response to applications on other would embark upon confining their contentions solely within frame work of Order 38 Rule 5 and 6 of CPC - At risk of repetition it has to be held that in face of their own admission about receipt of payments and also in face of their own statement that they were intending to sell property as they were in dire need of funds it is not open to respondents to raise contentions that applicant/ plaintiff has not come out with clear legal case for granting of relief under Order 38 Rules 5 and 6 of CPC - In considered opinion of this Court contention of respondents/ defendants is downright specious and no modicum of conviction is to be given credence to at all – Petition Allowed

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Order XXXVIII Rule 6 of C.P.C. to pass an order of attachment of the immovable property described in the schedule hereunder pending disposal of the suit.

SCHEDULE

All that piece and parcel of the property being the land and residential building bearing Plot No.B-40, AGS Staff Cooperative Building Society Layout now known as AGS Colony (Approved layout by the director of Town Planning, madras vide Ref. No.102/66) Kottivakkam village, Shozhinganallur Taluk, Kancheepuram District, comprised in S.No.227/5 as per Patta S.No.227/26 measuring an extent of 2 Grounds and 172 sq.ft. (i.e., 4972 sq.ft.) bounded on the

North by : 30 feet wide common road

South by : Lands owned by Sababathi and Gothandarama

East by : Plot No.39, AGS Colony

West by : Plot No.C22, AGS Colony)

The applicant herein is the plaintiff in the suit. The respondents herein are the defendants.

2. The suit has been filed for the following prayers.

(i) Direct the Defendants jointly and severally to pay the plaintiff the sum of Rs.2,47,37,753/- (Rupees Two Crores Forty Seven Lakhs Thirty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Three only) (i.e. Rs.2,10,00,000/- under Demand promissory notes 15.09.2019/24.09.2019; dated 30.12.2019; and 01.02.2020 executed by the Defendants in favour of the Plaintiff and Rs.37,37,753/- (Rupees Thirty Seven Lakhs Thirty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Three only) towards interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the respective dates of the Demand Promissory Notes till 16.09.2020);

(ii) Direct the Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff future interest at the rate of 24% p.a. on the Demand Promissory Notes of Rs.2,10,000/- (Rupees two Crores Ten Lakhs only) from the date of the plaint till the realization of the payment.

(iii) Direct the defendants to pay cost of the suit.

3. The facts which gave rise to the present dispute are briefly stated hereunder.

(a) The applicant/plaintiff was looking for house property in and around Kottivakkam and she had come to know that the Respondents/ defendants was owing a property situated at Plot No.B-40, AGS Staff Cooperative Building Society Layout, now known as AGS Colony, Kottivakkam Village, Shozhinganallur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

(b) Evincing interest in the schedule property, she appeared to have expressed her inclination for buying the property through outright sale. While the decision was taken to purchase the property, the plaintiff also appeared to have expressed her reservation in regard to a discrepancy in the extent of the land which is shown in the sale deed as 2 grounds and 172 sq.ft. (i.e., 4972 sq.ft.), but the extent shown in the patta was only 4307 sq.ft., having a short fall of 660 sq.ft. patta. According to the plaintiff, the defendants volunteered to rectify the error and the discrepancy in the patta and on the basis of the assurance, the plaintiff entered into a sale agreement on 15/24.09.2019. At the time, when the sale agreement was entered into, Rs.49,50,000/- had been paid as advance. The total consideration fixed for the sale of the subject property was Rs.9,00,00,000/- (Rupees Nine Crores only).

(c) It was mutually agreed in terms of the sale agreement that the sale transaction would be completed by 06.11.2019 and the balance sale consideration would be settled before the said date. For the amount received by the defendants as advance from the plaintiff, the defendants appeared to have executed a demand promissory note dated 15/24.09.2019 in terms of Clause 11 and Clause 12 of the sale agreement. There were other conditions in the sale agreement like, in case of failure to execute the sale deed, the defendants were to return the advance amount paid along with the liquidated damages of Rs.5 lakhs, without prejudice to the rights of purchaser to claim specific performance.

(d) It transpired subsequently that the defendants could not rectify the discrepancy in the patta relating to the shortf

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top