SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1822

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
S. Mariappan & Others – Appellants
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, Home (Transport) Department, Chennai & Others – Respondent
W.P. Nos. 8970, 10374, 10376 of 2009, 2410 of 2010 & M.P. Nos. 1+1+1 of 2009 & 1 of 2010
Decided on : 16-09-2021

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :V. Santharam for M/s. B. Satish Sundar, Advocates.
For the Respondents:V. Veluchamy, Government Advocate.

Headnote:

Entry Tax Act - Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2001 - Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Demanding or collecting entry tax - Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents and their subordinates from demanding or collecting entry tax on the petitioners used Toyota Prado Motor Car bearing Chassis and Engine to be registered and assign new registration mark by respondents - Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents and their subordinates from demanding or collecting entry tax on petitioners imported used Toyota land crusier Motor Car bearing Chassis and Engine to be registered and assign new registration mark by 3rd and 4th respondents - Held, However in respect of the Writ Petitions already dismissed Entry tax dues are yet to be collected by Department - Pursuant to circular issued by Commissioner, actions are taken to collect arrears - This Court is of the considered opinion that a little effort in dealing with Entry tax issue an amount more than Crores is collected in a short span of time - If department is consistent in pursuing collection of tax, then undoubtedly State will be in a position to collect substantial revenue dues in interest of public at large - Efficiency level in Department are to be improved only by consistent monitoring and functioning of Executives - Consistent actions in matter of collection of tax is of paramount importance - It is the duty mandated under provisions of Act and the failure amounts to dereliction of duty - Executives are duty bound to ensure that collections are made and disputes are to be pursued and settled at the earliest possible in order to honor Constitutional principles - Petitions stand disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents and their subordinates from demanding or collecting entry tax on the petitioners imported Toyota Motor Car bearing Chassis No.JZE 119-6019679 to be registered and assign new registration mark by the 3rd and 4th respondents.

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents and their subordinates from demanding or collecting entry tax on the petitioners used Toyota Prado Motor Car bearing Chassis No.JTEBY 29 JXO 0010474 and Engine No.1KZ 1053192 to be registered and assign new registration mark by the 3rd and 4th respondents.

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents and their subordinates from demanding or collecting entry tax on the petitioners imported used Toyota land crusier Motor Car bearing Chassis No.JTEHCO5J604020009 and Engine No.1HD 0249734 to be registered and assign new registration mark by the 3rd and 4th respondents.

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents and their subordinates from demanding or collecting entry tax on the petitioners used Toyota land cruiser Motor Vehicle bearing Chassis No. JTEHC05J704022058 and Engine No.1HD0256479 to be registered and assign new registration mark by the 3rd and 4th respondents.)

1. All these Writ Petitions are filed to forbear the respondents from demanding and collecting entry tax on the vehicles purchased by the petitioners. The respective vehicles purchased by the petitioners in all these Writ Petitions were imported from other countries. They have contended that import duty to the Customs Department had already been paid. While taking the vehicle for registration, the Regional Transport Officers concerned, demanded entry tax and thus, the petitioners are constrained to move the present Writ Petitions.

2. The validity of provisions of the Entry Tax Act was challenged under the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2001 and the issue went up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and the validity of the Act was upheld by the Courts.

3. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in clear terms held that the State is empowered to demand and collect Entry Tax in the case of State of Kerala and others vs. Fr.William Fernandez reported in [2018] 57 GSTR 6 (SC). Thus, the issue raised in these Writ Petitions are no more res-integra and the petitioners are liable to pay Entry tax as demanded by the respondents. In some cases, interim orders were granted on condition to pay part amount of entry tax and in some cases, interim orders are granted without any such conditions. Therefore, the respondent/Commercial Tax Department, is duty bound to calculate the arrears of Entry tax to be paid by the respective petitioners and calculation sheet / demand notice is to be issued enabling such petitioners to pay the Entry Tax.

4. It is brought to the notice of this Court that even in respect of the writ petitions already dismissed by this Court, based on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Commercial Tax Department issued a circular No. 20/2021 dated 01.09.2021. As per the circular, all the Assessing Officers are instructed to collect the outstanding Entry Tax in respect of the dismissed cases, immediately. The Joint Commissioner concerned are directed to monitor the work of collection of Entry Tax and send the compliance report in respect of their Division by 10th of every month. In respect of cases, where the Entry tax is not realisable, the Joint Commissioner concerned should explore all possible legal ways to realise the Government dues and report compliance. The instructions issued are directed to be followed scrupulously.

5. Mr.V.S.Velavan, State Tax Officer/Investi

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top