V.PARTHIBAN
M. A. M. R. Muthiah – Appellant
Versus
Chettinad Charitable Trust represented by its Trustee Dr. A. C. Muthiah – Respondent
ORDER :
(Prayer in A.No.6433/2019: To reject the plaint in C.S.No.138 of 2019 filed by the plaintiffs as a clear abuse of process and does not disclose any cause of action.
Prayer in C.S.No.138 of 2019:
(1) Declare that the 1st defendant is not a lawfully inducted trustee of the plaintiff trust. (1A) declare the Co-option of the 2nd defendant by 1st defendant as a trustee of the plaintiff Trust on 07.12.2015 is not true, valid and is void and unlawful and that she is therefore not a trustee of the plaintiff trust. (1B) Permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 and 2 from in any manner interfering with the administration or functioning of the plaintiff trust; (2) Declare that the lease deed dated 15.04.2016 executed by the 3rd defendant representing the Plaintiff Trust in favour of the 1st defendant is unlawful, illegal, invalid, void and not binding on the Plaintiff Trust; (2A) Directing the defendant No.1 to handover peaceful and vacant possession of the suit property to the plaintiff trust.
Prayer in O.A.No.156 of 2019:
To pass an order of ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents/defendants 1 to 3 their men, agents, servants and anyone claiming under or through them f
Mayer (H.K.) Ltd. And others. vs. Owners & Parties, vessel M.V.Fortune Express and others
Mytrah Energy (India) Limited v. Gamesa Renewable Private Limited
Nawal Kishore Sharma v. Union of India
Pawan Kumar vs. Babulal since deceased through legal representatives and others
Popat and Kotecha Property v. SBI Staff Assn.
Sejal glass Limited vs. Nivalan Merchants Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.