IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, JJ.
R. Bhojan - Appellant
Versus
The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Nilgiri Region, The Nilgiris & Others - Respondent
W.A. Nos. 459 & 698 of 2020 & C.M.P. Nos. 7050 & 9561 of 2020
Decided on : 21-09-2021
Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act - Section 153 - Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules - Will - Land - Legal Heirs - Whether Bhojan or Sadhasivam, is the nominee of the deceased - Land was assigned to villagers of Thengumarahada village to form a society known as Thengumarahada Vivasaya Corporation and to lease out land to members - Above assignment was issued in G.O. Development Department - Later, there was a modification and a revised Government Order was issued in G.O. Ms. by assigning 300 acres of land to the Society for a period of fie years with certain conditions - Co-operative Farming Society was formed and registered under Act, with an object to promote welfare of backward community, tribes, who are agricultural labourers and landless poor in district - Held, it is evident that Krishnan had nominated his second wife only till such time his grandson attains majority. When the said grandson attains majority, he would automatically become nominee of Krishnan. However, immediately after death of deceased, Chinnammal-C, who was nominee, was admitted as a member of Society. Admittedly, her letter to Society nominating Bhojan was rejected, as it was not in accordance with Form 17 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules. Therefore, when deceased Krishnan had appointed C only as a guardian of grandson to take care of the property during his minority, the said C, cannot acquire any right over property of deceased - A Will left by deceased nominating grandson also his heir, is not disputed by anybody - He is only the grandson-in-law of deceased Krishnan - It is not worthwhile even to refer the parties to civil court for obtaining a legal heir certificate or a succession certificate, as by no stretch of imagination, grandson-in-law be legal heir of deceased Krishnan - Bylaws further provides that any nomination has to be approved by Collector of Nilgiris and Circle Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies - Though appellant claims that he had been nominated by deceased, there is no document produced by him that his nomination was approved by the Collector and the Circle Deputy Registrar of the Co-operative Societies - Therefore, appellant has got no right to succeed to interest of deceased - Writ appeals dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J.
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the Common order dated 23.07.2019 in W.P.No.10351 of 2007.
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the Common order dated 23.07.2019 in W.P.No.10351 of 2007 and 42561 of 2006.)
1. These intra-court appeals are filed challenging the common order dated 23.07.2019 passed in W.P.No.10351 of 2007 and 42561 of 2006, which were directed against an order passed in Revision Petition No.513/2003/A4 dated 25.05.2006 by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies. The appellant in both the appeals, is the writ petitioner in W.P. No.10351 of 2007 and 5th respondent in W.P. No.42561 of 2006 respectively.
2. The short facts leading to the above appeals are as follows:- An extent of 100 Acres of land was assigned to the villagers of Thengumarahada village to form a society known as Thengumarahada Vivasaya Corporation and to lease out the land to the members. The above assignment was issued in G.O. Ms. No.4096 Development Department dated 05.08.1948. Later, there was a modification and a revised Government Order was issued in G.O. Ms. No.3846 dated 28.04.1951 by assigning 300 acres of land to the Society for a period of fie years with certain conditions.
3. The Thengumarahada Co-operative Farming Society was formed on 30.04.1952 and registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, with an object to promote the welfare of the backward community, tribes, who are agricultural labourers and landless poor in the district of Nilgiris. Each one of the members of the Society, is eligible to get lease of 2.00 Acres of wet land and 1.00 Acre of dry land from the Society. One Nariyananjan became a member of the Society on 12.11.1952 and he was allotted to an extent of 2.00 Acres agricultural land in Survey No.20/6 and 98 Cents in Survey No.53/2, totalling to 2.98 Acres. The lease of the eligible members was approved by the District Collector.
4. As per bylaw No.10 of the Society, every member of the Society, can nominate one person to succeed in the event of his/her death. The said Nariyananjan nominated his son N.Krishnan, as his successor. On the death of Nariyananjan on 24.05.1972, his son was admitted as a member of the Society, as per Resolution No.19A dated 12.03.1972 and the shares of Nariyananjan were transferred to N.Krishnan.
5. The said Krishnan had two wives, namely Belliammal and Chinnammal. The said Chinnammal had no issues. Belliammal had one son named Shanmugam and two daughters Devi and Mathiammal. Shanmugam’s son is Sadhasivam, petitioner in W.P. No.42561 of 2006 and Devi’s one of the sons-in-law is Bhojan, who is the petitioner in W.P. No.10351 of 2007. On 21.08.1989, the said Krishnan gave a nomination letter to the Society nominating his second wife Chinnammal, as successor till his grandson Sadhasivam, who is the petitioner in W.P. No.42561/2006, attains majority. The above said Krishnan also had executed a Will nominating his minor grandson Sadhasivam, as his nominee and till he attains majority, his second wife Chinnammal, to act as guardian.
6. After the death of Krishnan, the District Collector transferred the shares standing in the name of N.Krishnan to Chinnammal, who is the second wife, on 20.10.1995. On 22.03.1996, based on the nomination, Chinnammal was admitted as a member of the Society. After she became the member, the said Chinnammal wrote a letter to the Society, nominating the appellant herein instead of Sadhasivam. After issuing the said letter, Chinnammal died in the year 1997. Based on the strength of the letter, the appellant herein filed W.P. No.15187 of 1997 seeking a writ of mandamus to transfer the shares of late Chinnammal in his favour. However, the writ petition was dismissed on 03.11.1998 granting liberty to the appellant to raise a dispute before the appropriate forum under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act. Accordingly, a petition was filed under Section 90 of the Act, which was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.