SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1610

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Abdul Quddhose, J.
S. Sowmiya – Appellant
Versus
V. Kumar & Another – Respondents
C.M.A. No. 1616 of 2021
Decided On : 23-09-2021

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :K. Varadhakamaraj, Advocate.
For the Respondent:E. Rajadurai for M/s. M.B. Gopalan Associates, Advocates

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 - Accident - Compensation -Appeal filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation - Whether compensation can be enhanced - Held, Tribunal has failed to award any compensation towards ‘Loss of amenities of life’ to the appellant/claimant which she is legally entitled to - This Court, after due consideration of nature of injuries suffered by the appellant/claimant, awards compensation towards ‘Loss of Amenities’ - Appeal partly allowed

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to enhance the compensation awarded in the judgment and decree dated 25.06.2019 passed in M.C.O.P. No.1338 of 2014 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (III Small Causes Court), Chennai.)

(Heard video conference)

1. This appeal has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 25.06.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (III Small Causes Court), Chennai in M.C.O.P. No.1338 of 2014.

2. The appellant/claimant unsatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award has preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement.

3. The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award are as follows :

Heads

Amount awarded by the Tribunal (Rs.)

Disability

45,000

Pain and Sufferings

20,000

Transport and Extra Nourishment

20,000

Attender Charges

5,100

Damages to clothes

1,000

Medical Expenses

10,412.50

Total

1,01,512.50

4. Heard Mr. K.Varadhakamaraj, learned counsel for the appellant/claimant and Mr. E. Rajadurai, learned counsel for the respondent/Insurance Company.

5. This Court has perused and examined the impugned award passed by the Tribunal.

6. The appellant/claimant has sustained both bone fracture in the left leg and he was 19 years old student, doing B.Tech 1st year when the accident happened on 26.01.2014. The cause of the accident and the nature of injuries sustained by the appellant/claimant have not been disputed by the respondents as no appeal has been filed by the respondents aggrieved by the award passed by the tribunal.

7. The Medical Board which has examined the appellant/claimant has assessed her disability at 15% which has been accepted by the tribunal. This Court is in agreement with the said assessment. However, the tribunal has not taken into consideration the year of the accident for the purpose of assessing the disability compensation. The tribunal has awarded disability compensation at Rs.45,000/- for the 15% disability suffered by the appellant/claimant by fixing Rs.3,000/- per percentage of disability. After giving due consideration of the year of the accident, which happened in the year 2014, this Court enhances the compensation towards disability at Rs.60,000/- by taking Rs.4,000/- per percentage for the 15% disability suffered by the appellant/claimant, instead of Rs.45,000/- erroneously fixed by the tribunal.

8. The compensation awarded by the tribunal under other heads viz., Pain and Suffering, Extra Nourishment and Attendant Charges are also low and it has to be enhanced. After giving due consideration of the nature of injury and the treatment taken by the claimant, this Court enhances the compensation towards (i). Pain and Suffering at Rs. 25,000/-, (ii) Extra Nourishment and transport Rs.30,000/- and (iii). Attendant Charges at Rs.15,000/-. Insofar as the compensation awarded by the tribunal towards ‘Damages to clothes and medical expenses are concerned, which are supported by medical records, marked as Ex.5 before the tribunal, this Court confirms the same as it is in agreement with the settled practice. However the tribunal has failed to award any compensation towards ‘Loss of amenities of life’ to the appellant/claimant which she is legally entitled to. Hence, this Court, after due consideration of nature of injuries suffered by the appellant/claimant, awards compensation of Rs.25,000/- towards ‘Loss of Amenities’.

9. For the foregoing reasons, the compensation awarded by the tribunal at Rs.1,01,512.50/- is enhanced to Rs.1,66,412.50, rounded of to Rs.1,66,415/- as detailed hereunder;

Heads

Amount awarded by the Tribunal (Rs.)

Amount modified by this Court (Rs.)

15% disability

45,000

(15 x 3000)

60,000

(15 x 4000)

Pain and suffer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top