P.T.ASHA
Muruhavel Finance – Appellant
Versus
Muthusami – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.T. ASHA, J.
Prayer in A.S. No. 824 of 2008: Appeal suit filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 48 of 2007 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Erode dated 31.01.2008.
Prayer in A.S. No. 825 of 2008: Appeal suit filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 50 of 2007 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Erode dated 31.01.2008.
1. A common Judgment is being pronounced in the above First Appeal, since the facts in both the suits namely O.S. No. 48 of 2007 and O.S. No. 50 of 2007 are identical, in so far as the plaintiff is concerned and the cause of action for filing the suit. However, I shall be dealing with the pleadings in both the suits separately. The parties are referred to in the same rank as before the Trial Court.
Plaintiff's case in O.S. No. 48 of 2007:
2. The plaintiff claims to be a registered firm doing finance business at Erode. The firm is a registered firm. The first defendant which was a proprietary concern do
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.