Sakthivel vs State, Represented by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruppur

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1670

P.N.PRAKASH, R.N.MANJULA
Sakthivel – Appellant
Versus
State, Represented by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruppur – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : N. Manokaran.
For the Respondent: M. Babu Muthu Meeran, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

R.N. Manjula, J.

(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 30.07.2018 made in S.C.No.229 of 2014 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruppur.)

1. This Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellant/Accused to set aside the conviction and sentence made in S.C.No.229/2014 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruppur, dated 30.07.2018, as tabulated hereunder:

Sl. No.	Provision under which convicted	Sentence
1.	Section 376(I) IPC	Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment

2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows:

The victim ‘X’ was married to one Sathyamoorthy 6 years prior to the date of occurrence and they were living in the house of her father Nataraj (PW.1). She has moderate mental retardation. The husband of the victim had deserted her after 6 months of marriage and hence the victim was residing along with her parents. On 05.02.2014 at about 3.00 pm the victim ‘X’ went outside her

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1670

P.N.PRAKASH, R.N.MANJULASakthivel – AppellantVersusState, Represented by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruppur – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

P.N.PRAKASH, R.N.MANJULA
Sakthivel – Appellant
Versus
State, Represented by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruppur – Respondent