RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Sundaramurthy – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, CCI/WCID, Thiruvallur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer in both Crl.R.Cs.: Criminal Revision Cases filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, praying to set aside the judgment passed by the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur, in Criminal Appeal No.98 of 2013, dated 17.12.2014, reversing the order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ponneri, in C.C.No.73 of 2004, dated 31.01.2013.)
1. The matters are heard through “Video Conference”.
The convicted accused Nos.1 and 2 have preferred the above criminal revision cases against the judgment passed by the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur, in Criminal Appeal No.98 of 2013, dated 17.12.2014, reversing the order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ponneri, in C.C.No.73 of 2004, dated 31.01.2013.
2. The respondent police has filed final report in Crime No.1 of 2003 alleging that the first accused by name Selvaraj was working as Secretary and the second accused namely, Sundaramurthy was working as Cashier in Ponneri Co-operative Rural Bank. On 14.10.1996, A.1 has falsified the accounts and misappropriated a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- from the fixed deposit of Thiru Masilamani and further, on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.