JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in his proceedings Naka.No.3/2816/97 dated 18.08.1998 and confirmed in Crl.A.No.103/2003 on the file of the Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and set aside the same.)

1. The matter is heard through “Video Conference”.

2. The unsuccessful owner of the rice and lorry are the revision petitioners herein.

3. Heard, the learned Government Advocate for the respondent. There is no representation for the petitioner.

4. On perusal of the record, I find that the first revision petitioner is the owner of the lorry, which was confiscated. The revision petitioners 2 and 3 are the owners of the rice, necessary action has been taken after the seizure of the material under the Essential Commodities Act. The confiscation authority has seized the 119 bags of rice along with the lorry and passed an order of confiscation and the same was challenged before the Principal Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in Crl.A.No.103/2015 dated 20.03.2015, with the modification, the appeal was allowed. Having not satisfied, they preferred this revision.

5.