SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2096

R.THARANI
Shanthi – Appellant
Versus
Uchimahali – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
T. Selvakumaran, S. Srinivasa Raghavan, P. Prabhakaran, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.441 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirunelveli, dated 27.08.2012.

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.441 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirunelveli, dated 27.08.2012.)

1. Both the Appeals are arising out of the same order, dated 27.08.2012, in M.C.O.P.No.441 of 2011, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirunelveli.

2. C.M.A.(MD)No.1326 of 2013 has been filed by the Claimant and C.M.A.(MD)No.228 of 2014 has been filed by the Transport Corporation.

3. Brief substance of the petition in M.C.O.P.No.441 of 2011, is as follows:-

The petitioner was aged about 19 years at the time of accident and she worked as a police in Manimutharu Battalion and she was earning Rs.11,500/- per month. On 26.08.2011, at about 2.00 p.m., when the petitioner was travelling in a Bus bearing Registra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top