IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
Dr. P. Basumani - Appellant
Versus The Tamilnadu Medical Council, Represented by its Registrar, Chennai – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 12303 of 2021 & WMP. No. 13086 of 2021
Decided on : 26-10-2021
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 465, 467, 468, 474, 420 and 120(b) - Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 226 , 14 and 21 National Medical Commission Act, 2019 - Section 27 ,30,57,30,(2) and 61 - Medical Council Act, 1956 - Code of Medical Ethics, 2002 - Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, - Dentists Act, 1948 - Revised Dentists (Code of Ethics) Regulations, 2014 - Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 42 - Punishment for forgery – Power of high Court to issue certain writs - Respondent filed a detailed counter affidavit wherein it is inter alia stated that on receipt of complaint from Medical Council of India case was referred to disciplinary committee which issued summons to and accordingly he appeared before committee and gave his deposition - During course of personal hearing submitted a letter addressed to police authorities by Fortis Hospital stating that patient was conscious on whereas entries in case records were contrary to condition of patient stated in said letter - Disciplinary committee called upon former Primary Consultant as well as present Medical Superintendent of said Hospital - Whether he was aware of contents of letter addressed to Medical Superintendent and for that matter he was not aware of reply given by Medical Superintendent – Held, Court also, from records, is unable to find even any probability of joint decision or instruction from petitioner to Medical Superintendent for him to issue such a letter contrary to t medical records of patient to police authorities - Court violation of principles of natural justice has caused serious prejudice to him - As a matter of fact, during course of hearing such procedural lapses have also been agreed upon on side of respondent - Court is of opinion that without any complaint act of disciplinary committee being quasi judicial authority to recommend for imposition of punishment on petitioner that too without providing any opportunity to him is wholly unjustified and same is liable to be set aside - Petitioner has taken a clear stand that he was caught unaware of action taken against him behind his back - Copy of report was not furnished to him - As stated earlier, enquiry was not against petitioner and he was summoned only to give material evidence - Alleged statement of other witness namely medical superintendent was not furnished to petitioner - Writ Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order in Reference No. TNMC/DC 136 of 2018 dated 04.05.2021 issued by the respondent in so far as it relates to the petitioner and quash the same.)
1. This writ petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 04.05.2021 passed by the respondent insofar as it relates to the petitioner.
2. The petitioner is a practising Doctor with specialisation in Gastroenterology. According to him, he has 35 years of practice and is presently working as Consultant Gastroenterologist at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai.
3. It is stated in the writ petition that during the year 2015, when the petitioner was working as a Primary Consultant at Fortis Malar Hospital, Chennai, he along with other specialists, examined a patient by name N.Pitchaimani, aged 66 years, on 27.09.2015, who was suffering from the symptoms of disorientation, generalized weakness, giddiness and turbid urine and was admitted in the hospital on the same day. The petitioner also stated that the condition of the patient improved initially and he was shifted to the general ward from Intensive Care Unit (ICU) on 04.10.2015. However, his condition suddenly deteriorated on 07.10.2015 and he was again shifted to ICU. As the condition of the patient deteriorated further, he was advised intubation and ventilation on 09.10.2015, but despite the best treatment afforded, the patient breathed his last on 11.10.2015 at 11.25 pm.
4. The petitioner further stated that on 12.04.2021, he received a summons from the respondent/Tamil Nadu Medical Council, directing him to appear before a committee on 22.04.2021 and give evidence with regard to the enquiry initiated against one Dr.Radhakrishnan of Combatore, on the basis of the complaint given by Sri Subhitha of Chennai, alleging that the said Dr.Radhakrishnan has issued a false fitness certificate to her father, based on which, various properties worth about Rs.50 crores have been registered in the name of Sakthi Kumar, who is son-in-law of the said Dr.Radhakrishnan. In response to the summons issued by the respondent, the petitioner appeared before the committee on 22.04.2021 and gave his statement. Thereafter, the respondent passed an order on 04.05.2021, imposing the punishment of removal of his name from the Medical Register of Tamil Nadu Medical Council for a period of six months. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is before this Court with this writ petition.
5.1 Upon notice, the respondent filed a detailed counter affidavit, wherein, it is inter alia stated that on receipt of the complaint from the Medical Council of India, the case was referred to the disciplinary committee, which issued summons to Dr.Radhakrishnan and accordingly, he appeared before the committee and gave his deposition. During the course of personal hearing, Dr.Radhakrishnan submitted a letter addressed to the police authorities by Fortis Malar Hospital, stating that the patient was conscious on 08.10.2015, whereas the entries in the case records were contrary to the condition of the patient stated in the said letter. Therefore, the disciplinary committee called upon the former Primary Consultant as well as the present Medical Superintendent of the said Hospital. Though Dr.Praveen B.Nilgar and Dr.Anand Mohan Pai, were unable to appear before the committee on 23.09.2019, but they appeared on 12.11.2019 and gave statement that at the time of incident, they were not employed in the said hospital and all their statements were made based on the available medical records. In such circumstances, the disciplinary committee sent summons to the petitioner, who treated the patient at that time. On receipt of the summons, he appeared before the committee on 22.04.2021 and gave his deposition.
5.2 The counter affidavit further proceeds to state t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.