SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2222

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
M. Ramalingam – Appellant
Versus
P. Jhansi – Respondent
Review Application No. 87 of 2021
Decided on : 08-10-2021

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sanath Kumar, G. Saravanan, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Thanjai P.N. Chezhian, Advocate.

Headnote:

Code of Civil Procedure,1908 - Section 34(1) – Rule 1 Order 47 - Suit for recovery of money - learned counsel for review petitioner mainly contended that error apparent in order passed by Court is regarding interest directed to be paid at rate of 12% per annum over principal amount It is contended that as per Section 34(1) of Code of Civil Procedure interest which could be awarded should not exceed 6% per annum in suit for recovery of money other than commercial transactions - However learned counsel for respondent relied on proviso by stating that where liability in relation to sum so adjudged had arisen out of a commercial transaction rate of such further interest may exceed six per cent per annum – Held, Defendant is directed to pay plaint amount and pay interest for principal amount rate of 6% per annum from date of plaint till date of realization - Respective learned counsel for review petitioner and learned counsel for respondent made a submission that parties have agreed to settle decree amount in four equal instalments commencing from and ending with Court review appellant is directed to settle decree amount with interest in four equal instalments and final instalment is to be paid on or before - Petition Allowed

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Review Application preferred under Order 47, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment of this Court passed in A.S.No.533 of 2018 dated 19.02.2020.)

The present Review Application is filed to review the judgment passed by this Court in A.S.No.533 of 2018 dated 19.02.2020.

2. The learned counsel for the review petitioner mainly contended that the error apparent in the order passed by this Court is regarding the interest directed to be paid at the rate of 12% per annum over the principal amount of Rs.10,00,000/-. It is contended that as per Section 34(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the interest which could be awarded should not exceed 6% per annum in the suit for recovery of money other than commercial transactions.

3. However, the learned counsel for the respondent relied on the proviso by stating that where the liability in relation to the sum so adjudged had arisen out of a commercial transaction, the rate of such further interest may exceed six per cent per annum.

4. The learned counsel for the respondent states that it is the commercial suit. However, the petitioner contends that it is not commercial suit. But this Court cannot adjudicate these merits in review proceedings. Only if an error apparent is established, then the order needs to be reviewed, but not otherwise.

5. The interest in a non-commercial suit would be not more than 6% per annum. This being the prescription contemplated under Section 34(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, this Court is inclined to review the order to the extent of modifying the interest amount to be paid by the review petitioner.

6. Thus, the order stands reviewed to the extent stated hereunder:-

“Accordingly, the appellant/defendant is directed to pay the plaint amount of Rs.10,87,500/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Eighty Seven Thousand and Five Hundred only) and pay interest for the principal amount of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of plaint till the date of realisation.”

7. The respective learned counsel for the review petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent made a submission that the parties have agreed to settle the decree amount in four equal instalments commencing from 10th November, 2021 and ending with 10th February, 2022. Thus, the review petitioner/appellant is directed to settle the decree amount with interest in four equal instalments and the final instalment is to be paid on or before 10.02.2022.

8. Accordingly, the Review Petition stands allowed in part to the extent stated above. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top