P. Jayammal, Prop. Deepa Arul Oil Mill vs K. Chellam

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1948

R.N.MANJULA
P. Jayammal, Prop. Deepa Arul Oil Mill – Appellant
Versus
K. Chellam – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :M. Muniruddin Sherif, Advocate
For the Respondent:N. Manoharan, M/s. R. Revathy, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and Decree of the Subordinate Judge, Thiruchengode, allowing the A.S.No.64 of 2008 dated 27.11.2008 against the Judgment and Decree of the District Munsif Court, Thiruchengode passed in O.S.No.93 of 99 dated 26.09.2005.

Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and Decree of the Subordinate Judge, Thiruchengode in A.S.No.63 of 2008 dated 27.11.2008 reversing the Judgment and decree of the District Munsif Court, Thiruchengode passed in O.S.No.280 of 89 dated 26.09.2005.)

(Heard through video conferencing)

1. The Second Appeal in 717 of 2009 has been filed against the judgment and Decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Thiruchengode, allowing the A.S.No.64 of 2008 dated 27.11.2008 against the Judgment and decree of the District Munsif Court, Thiruchengode passed in O.S.No.93 of 99 dated 26.09.2005 and the Second Appeal in 768 of 2009 has been filed against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Thiruchengode in A.S.No.63 of 2008 dated 27.11.2008 reve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1948

R.N.MANJULAP. Jayammal, Prop. Deepa Arul Oil Mill – AppellantVersusK. Chellam – Respondent

R.N.MANJULA
P. Jayammal, Prop. Deepa Arul Oil Mill – Appellant
Versus
K. Chellam – Respondent