M.DHANDAPANI
P. Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This petition is listed today under the caption “For Clarification” at the instance of the Court.
2. Vide order dated 23.8.2021, this Court had granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner on certain conditions. Pursuant to the said order, a letter has been received from the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram, detailing certain aspects, which were not available/placed before the Court at the time when this Court had considered the petition for grant of anticipatory bail. In view of the changed circumstances, as is evident from the letter of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram, the present petition is taken up again for consideration.
3. The case, as projected by the prosecution is that the petitioner is a practicing Advocate, who was the counsel on record for the claimant in MCOP No.911/2011 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram, in which an award for a sum of Rs.3,78,000/- was passed in favour of the claimants therein. The complaint emanated on the allegation that the petitioner had misappropriated the claim amount by causing impersonation of the claimants by some other persons.
4. When the case was taken up by this Court on 23.8.2021, it was p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.