SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1940

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. Subramaniam, J.
EVP Estates & Properties Development Ltd., - Petitioner
Versus
Tamil Nadu Public Works Department, Rep. by its Chief Engineer, Chennai – Respondent
W.P. No. 40329 of 2016 & W.M.P. No. 34404 of 2016
Decided On : 23-09-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S.R. Raghunathan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:K.M.D. Muhilan, Government Advocate.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 – Article 226 - Relief sought for in present writ petition is to forbear respondents from constructing a Canal in land in Village - Writ petition is filed based on apprehension by petitioner EVP Estates and Properties Development Limited - It is contended by petitioner that Tamil Nadu Public Works Department officials were digging up a portion of land to construct a Canal and said property belongs to petitioner herein to carry water discharged from sluice tank through a channel classified as such in revenue records and in Village of enters into limits of same village, which belongs to petitioner herein - It is a natural course available for past several decades which has been used by agriculturists depending on tank for irrigation as a customary right and privilege - Court heavy and torrential rain that battered and Chennai Districts in there was flooding in Village, it is duty of respondent Department to desilt, widening and other sine qua non works in water bodies to facilitate easy draining of any surplus water from water sheds from upland so as to avoid recurrence of such incidence in event of heavy rain during current North East Monsoon – Held, Present writ petition such a relief in nature of injunction cannot be granted as authorities have not infringed rights of petitioner - Contrarily have taken steps to ensure free flow of water during rainy seasons and to protect water bodies and natural course of water in that particular area - While doing so Government is empowered to initiate all further actions and to ensure that public interest is protected – Court being power conferred on Government petitioner cannot seek such a blanket injunction in a writ proceedings stating that authorities should not interfere when there is a dispute in respect of the land belongs to the petitioner. In this regard, the authorities competent are bound to verify revenue records and initiate appropriate action in manner known to law - As far as encroachments are concerned said encroachments in water bodies and Government lands are to be evicted by following procedures - Government is protecting natural water course which is already in existence said action cannot be said to be illegal and therefore relief as such sought for cannot be granted - Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from constructing a Canal in the land in S.Nos.1/1, 1/2A, 1/2B and 2/2 in Nemilicherry Village and S.No.35/1 in Karunakaracherry Village, Poonamallee Panchayat, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District, belonging to and owned absolutely by the petitioner.)

1. The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to forbear the respondents from constructing a Canal in the land in S.Nos.1/1, 1/2A, 1/2B and 2/2 in Nemilicherry Village and S.No.35/1 in Karunakaracherry Village, Poonamallee Panchayat, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

2. The writ petition is filed based on the apprehension by the petitioner / EVP Estates and Properties Development Limited. It is contended by the petitioner that the Tamil Nadu Public Works Department officials were digging up a portion of the land to construct a Canal and the said property belongs to the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has stated that they sent representation to redress their grievances and to stop further digging up the property belongs to the petitioner. However, the respondents refused to accept the objections. Thus, the writ petitioner is constrained to move the present writ petition.

4. The counter filed by the respondents during November 2016 would reveal that the petitioner has suppressed the fact that there has been a water course in S.Nos.1,2 and 9 of Nemilicherry Village of Thiruvallur Taluk, which is owned by the petitioner herein to carry the water discharged from the sluice No.2 of the Tirunindravur tank through a channel classified as such in the revenue records and in S.Nos.10/3, 11/2, 27/3, 29 and 37 of Nemilicherry Village of Tiruvallur District and enters into the limits of S.Nos.1,2 and 9 of the same village, which belongs to the petitioner herein. It is a natural course available for the past several decades which has been used by the agriculturists depending on the Tirunindravur tank for irrigation as a customary right and privilege. In view of the heavy and torrential rain that battered the Tiruvallur, Kanchipuram and Chennai Districts in November and December 2015, there was flooding in Annai Indra Nagar Annex, EVP Town, Padmavathy Nagar and Devi Nagar in Nemilicherry Village, it is the duty of the respondent Department to desilt, widening and other sine qua non works in the water bodies to facilitate easy draining of any surplus water from the water sheds from the upland so as to avoid recurrence of such incidence in the event of heavy rain during the current North East Monsoon.

5. Hence, the natural water course available in the patta land of the petitioner for irrigating and draining the water collected in the upland was desilted and trimmed to facilitate easy draining of water of the tank, which caused inundation due to backing up in the months of November and December 2015. The respondents have further elaborated regarding the encroachment in certain locations in that area in Paragraphs 5, 7 and 8 as under:

    “5. The Tamil Nadu Government enacted the Tamil Nadu Protection of Tank and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 (Act, 2007) for the purpose of providing measures for checking the encroachment, eviction of encroachment in tanks which are under the control and management of Public Works Department, protection of such tanks and for matters incidental thereto and this Act plays dual role for the protection of tank and for eviction of encroachments and the terms 'field channel' and 'field drainage' in this Act has been defined as follows:

“field channel' means a channel existing or to be constructed to receive and distribute water for irrigation;

'field drainage' means a water course which discharges waste or surplus water from the land;”

As such both the terms 'field channel' and 'field drainage' form part and parcel of the Tirunindravur tank system for the purpose of protection as envisaged in the Act, 2007, if not for e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top