SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1994

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Shanthi – Appellant
Versus
Shanthi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:N. Suresh, Advocate
For the Respondent:A.E. Ravichandran, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 09.08.2021 in I.A.No.68 of 2021 in O.S.No.153 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal Sub Judge, Kallakurichi and thereby allow the revision.)

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed in I.A.No.68 of 2021 in O.S.No.153 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal Sub Judge, Kallakurichi.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner filed I.A.No.68 of 2021 under Order I Rule 10 C.P.C., for impleading the petitioner as eighth defendant in the suit. The reason for filing the petition is that the third defendant in the suit sold the suit property to the seventh defendant. The seventh defendant plotted it out and sold to many persons. Petitioner purchased one plot from the seventh defendant. Plaintiff filed a petition to implead the subsequent purchasers as a defendants in the suit by filing I.A.No.228 of 2016. The petitioner was 25th respondent in this petition. However, plaintiff had not pressed this petition. It appears that the plaintiff and seventh defendant are trying to get a collusive ex-parte decr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top