R.THARANI
K. S. Ravichandran – Appellant
Versus
Venkatesan – Respondent
ORDER :
R. Tharani, J.
1. This revision has been filed to call for the records and to set aside the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam, in Crl. M.P. No. 2043 of 2020 in C.C. No. 442 of 2016, dated 18.12.2020.
2. The revision petitioner is the defacto complainant and the respondents 1 and 2 are the accused in the case in C.C. No. 442 of 2016. The respondents 1 and 2 filed a discharge petition in Crl. M.P. No. 2043 of 2020, before the Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District and that petition was allowed by the Judicial Magistrate. Against the same, the petitioner preferred this Revision.
3. On the side of the revision petitioner, it is stated that the petitioner lodged a private complaint in the year 2016 and the same was taken on file as C.C. No. 442 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam. The respondents fabricated some documents regarding the property and they committed theft of fencing materials placed by the revision petitioner and the respondents scolded the revision petitioner in filthy language, hence, the petitioner filed a private complaint in C.C. No. 442 of 2016. Initially, the respondents filed a discharge petition in Cr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.