SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2274

M.SUNDAR
Noble Broadcasting Corporation Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Star Music Records, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R. Amizhdhu
For the Respondents: S. Gayathri and M.V. Swaroop

ORDER :

M. Sundar, J.

1. Mr. R. Amizhdhu, learned counsel on record for sole petitioner and Ms. S. Gayathri, learned counsel on record for sole respondent are before me.

2. Both learned counsel submit in unison that the dispute with respect to the arbitration award under challenge in the captioned OP has been settled out of Court between the parties. Learned counsel for petitioner also seeks permission to withdraw captioned OP as settled out of Court.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo dated 02.03.2021 signed by authorized signatory of the petitioner company and the counsel, which is as follows:

4. This takes us to request of the petitioner counsel for refund of full court fee as this is a matter settled out of Court without taking recourse to modes adumbrated under Section 89 of 'The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908' ('CPC' for brevity). In this regard, law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in The High Court of Judicature at Madras v. M.C. Subramaniam and Ors., reported in AIR Online 2021 SC 77) is applicable. Relevant paragraphs in M.C. Subramaniam's case are paragraphs 26 and 27 and the same read as follows:

    26. Thus, even though a strict construction of the terms of Se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top