SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2443

R.THARANI
Esakkiammal – Appellant
Versus
Sainudeen – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :T. Selvakumaran, Advocate.
For the Respondents:K. Murugesan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.274 of 2012, dated 18.09.2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal – IV Additional District Court, Tirunelveli.

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.275 of 2012, dated 18.09.2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal – IV Additional District Court, Tirunelveli.)

1. C.M.A.(MD)No.719 of 2014 is filed against the award, dated 18.09.2012, in M.C.O.P.No.274 of 2012, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal – IV Additional District Court, Tirunelveli.

2. C.M.A.(MD)No.720 of 2014 is filed against the award, dated 18.09.2012, in M.C.O.P.No.275 of 2012, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal – IV Additional District Court, Tirunelveli.

3. The appellants in both the appeals herein are the claimants, the respondents herein are the respondents in the original claim petitions. Since both the M.C.O.P.Nos.274 of 2012 and 275 of 2012 were filed before the IV Additional District Court, Tirunelveli, clai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top