SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2510

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
S. Paul Raj – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar, Mettur Taluk, Salem & Another – Respondents
W.P.No. 15193 of 2016 & W.M.P. Nos. 13240 & 13241 of 2016
Decided on : 17-11-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :P. Saravanan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: C. Jayaprakash, Adv

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 - Schedule Caste - 'Adi-Dravidar' - Petitioner possesses educational qualification of Bachelor of Electrical & Electronics Engineering - Petitioner belongs to Christian - Respondent has given a community certificate to petitioner as Backward Class as per G.O. Social Welfare Department - Petitioner married one girl, who studied up to Master of Physical Education - She belongs to Hindu community - Marriage between petitioner and the said one was solemnized - Wife of the petitioner was given the Community Certificate as Scheduled Caste as per SI. of SC/ST (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Whether one had a Muslim life with Muslim surroundings or Christian life with Christian Surroundings – Held, This Court is of considered opinion that conversion from one religion to another religion will not change caste of a person which he belongs - In the present case, petitioner admittedly belongs to Christian community and by virtue of conversion to Christianity he was issued with Backward Class certificate - However, by birth, petitioner belongs to 'Adi-Dravidar' community and change of religion will not change community - Classification of Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes, Most Backward Classes, Backward Classes and Other castes will not change caste - It is the caste/community which has to be taken into consideration and when both husband and wife belongs to same caste/community, then they are not entitled for inter-caste marriage certificate for purpose of availing benefits under various schemes - Order impugned passed is in consonance with principles laid down - There is no infirmity in impugned order - Writ Petition stands dismissed - Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records from the Respondent's proceedings vide order O.Mu.8147/14A5 dated 19.06.2015, and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondent to issue the inter-caste marriage certificate to the petitioner.)

1. The petitioner possesses the educational qualification of Bachelor of Electrical & Electronics Engineering. The petitioner belongs to Christian Adi-Dravida. The 1st respondent has given a community certificate to the petitioner as Backward Class as per G.O.Ms.1564, Social Welfare Department dated 30.07.1985. The petitioner married one girl, namely, G.Amutha, who studied up to Master of Physical Education. She belongs to Hindu Arunthathiyar community. The marriage between the petitioner and the said Amutha was solemnized on 02.03.2009 at Thippi Reddy Thirumana Mandapam, Kolathur Mettur (Taluk), Salem District. The wife of the petitioner was given the Community Certificate as Scheduled Caste as per SI.No.5 of SC/ST (Amendment) Act, 1976.

2. Under these circumstances, the petitioner relying on G.O.Ms.No.188, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Personnel-P) Department dated 28.12.1976, has submitted an application for grant of inter-caste marriage certificate for the purpose of availing the benefits of priority in public employments.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the said G.O.Ms.No.188 dated 28.12.1976 and contended that the Government Order says that "Where one of the spouses belongs to SC/ST, then inter-caste marriage certificate has to be issued in favour of the petitioner”. In the present case, the petitioner was issued with the community certificate as 'Backward Caste' and his wife was issued with the community certificate as 'Scheduled Caste' and therefore, it is an inter-caste marriage and accordingly, the petitioner is entitled to get inter-caste marriage certificate for the purpose of availing the benefits including priority in public employment.

4. The learned Government Advocate contended that the Government has issued clarification that conversion of religion would not entail a person to get an inter-caste marriage certificate.

5. In this regard, the clarification was issued by the Government in letter No.235, Social Welfare Department dated 21.07.1997. As per the said clarification, change of religion could not be a ground to grant inter-caste marriage certificate. Relying on the said clarification letter, the learned Government counsel reiterated that the case of the petitioner was rightly rejected. Even in the impugned order, it is stated that, as per the inquiry report received from the Revenue Inspector, Mettur, the petitioner S.Paulraj as well as his wife Smt.G.Amutha by birth belongs to Christian Adi-Dravidar and Hindu Arunthathiyar community, respectively. Therefore, the inter-caste marriage certificate cannot be granted.

6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Soosai Etc. Vs. Union of India and others – 1986 AIR 733, delivered a judgment on 30.09.1985 and made an observation that "The expression Scheduled Caste is defined in clause 24 of Article 366 to mean such castes, races or tribes or parts of or groups within such castes, races or tribes as are deemed under Article 341 to be Scheduled Castes for the purpose of this Constitution."

The Apex Court further observed that "Now it cannot be disputed that the Caste System is a feature of the Hindu Social structure. It is a social phenomenon peculiar to Hindu Society. The division of the Hindu social order by reference at one time to professional or vocational occupation was moulded into a structural hierarchy which over the centuries crystallized into a stratification where the place of the individual was determined by birth. Those who occupied the lowest rung of the social ladder were treated as existing beyond the periphery of civilised society, and were indeed not even "touchable"

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top