IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
Rajapandi & Another - Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chennai (Crime No.91/12) - Respondent
Crl.A. Nos. 155 of 2015 & 213 of 2016 & Crl.M.P. No. 3229 of 2016
Decided on : 29-11-2021
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 63 to 70 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 374(2), 428 and 313 – Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985 - Section 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii) (C),57,50(i) and Sections 42 (i) 42(ii) 50(1) – Ganja – Drugs - Case of prosecution is that, based on source of secret information and after getting permission from higher officials, then Inspector of Police has conducted vehicle check-up and at that time, one White colour Innova car came to the spot along with accused persons - Accused were arrested by then Deputy Superintendent of Police and brought to Police Station and their confession statement was recorded, wherein they have stated that have given an amount to get the 'Ganja', and they have purchased 300kgs of Ganja from Andhra Pradesh and transported same by Innova Car – Held, According to counsel, accused was remanded to Judicial custody - Statutory prescription is of minimum sentence of 10 years and same is awarded by learned Sessions Judge - Since it is minimum sentence, this Court finds that sentence awarded by trial Court/Special Judge cannot be termed as excessive and the same is hereby confirmed - In such circumstances, court are of the view that it is duty of Court to keep in view nature of offence, circumstances in which it was committed, position of offender and other relevant considerations such as pecuniary circumstances of accused person as to character and magnitude of offence before ordering the offender to suffer imprisonment in default of payment of fine - Provisions of Sections 63 to 70 of I.P.C make it clear that an amount of fine should not be harsh or excessive – Court also reiterate that where a substantial term of imprisonment is inflicted, an excessive fine should not be imposed except in exceptional cases - Consequently, connected Crl.M.P is closed – Order accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
(Common Prayer : Petitions filed under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C, to set aside the judgment passed in C.C.No.46 of 2012 dated 21.07.2014 on the file of the Principal Special Judge, First Additional Special Court, (FAC) NDPS Act, Chennai - 104.)
1. The convicted A1 is the appellant in Crl.A.No.213 of 2016 herein., While A2 is the appellant in Crl.A.No.155 of 2015.
2. These Criminal Appeals are filed against the judgment pronounced by the learned Principal Special Judge, First Additional Special Court, (FAC), NDPS Act, Chennai - 104 in C.C.No.46/2012 dated 21.07.2014, convicting A2 for the offences under Section 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii) (C) of NDPS Act, 1985, as amended by Act, 9/01 and sentenced him to undergo 10 years Rigourous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/-, in default, to undergo 1 year Rigourous Imprisonment. A1 was convicted under Section 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(c) of NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2 lakhs, in default, to undergo 2 years Rigorous Imprisonment A3 was acquitted of charges. As against A4, separate trial was conducted in C.C.No.69/2013).
3. The respondent/Police filed charge sheet alleging that after completion of thorough and detailed investigation and based on the statements of the witnesses and confession statement of the accused, the then Deputy Superintendent of Police has laid the charge sheet against the accused (A1 to A3) in Chennai NIB C11) Crime No.91/2012 under Sections 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(c) of NDPS Act and the same was submitted before the learned Principal Special Judge, First Additional Special Court, [FAC] NDPS Act, Chennai - 104 and the same was taken on file vide C.C.No.46 of 2012, dated 07.12.2012.
4. Though the order of conviction was passed on 21.07.2014 appeals have been preferred from custody with a delay and after condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the appeals have been taken on file and assigned the number as stated supra.
5. A1 and A2 were convicted as stated supra and separate appeals have been filed by them.
6. The case of the prosecution is that, based on the source of secret information and after getting the permission from the higher officials, on 20.08.2012, the then Inspector of Police has conducted the vehicle check-up near 100 feet road, Vadapalani, Chennai and at that time, one White colour Innova car bearing Registration No.TN 58 U 0820 came to the spot from Andhra Pradhesh along with the accused persons, by name, 1) Sekar [A1) and 2) Rajapondi [A2] and it was found that 300 kilos dry Ganja was smuggled by them for Ganesan @ Kundu Ganesan [A3] and Selvam @ Thavakkalai Selvam [A4] from Madurai District.
7. The accused [A1 to A3] were arrested by the then Deputy Superintendent of Police and brought to the Police Station and their confession statement was recorded, wherein they have stated that A3 & A4 have given an amount of Rs.80,000/- and Rs.25,000/- respectively to get the 'Ganja', and they have purchased 300kgs of Ganja from Andhra Pradesh and transported the same by Innova Car.
8. As per the special report of the then Inspector of Police, a case was registered in Chennai NIB CID Crime No.91 of 2012 under Section 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act,1985.
9. During the course of the investigation, then Deputy Superintendent of Police has examined 8 witnesses and recorded their statements.
10. After completion of trial, the learned Principal Special Judge, First Additional Special Court, (FAC), NDPS Act, Chennai - 104 convicted the accused and sentenced them as follows on 21.07.2014:-
| A-1 | 8(c) r/w 20 (b) (ii) (c)of NDPS Act | 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,00,000/- in default to undergo 2 years simple imprisonment |
| A-2 | 8(c) r/w 20 (b) (ii)(c)of NDPS Act | 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine Rs.1,00,000/- |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.