RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Rajaraman – Appellant
Versus
Arumugam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.45 of 2010, by the learned Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram, dated 28.04.2011, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.5 of 2006, by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Parangipettai, dated 28.09.2010.)
1. Notice of motion alone was ordered in this Second Appeal.
2. The unsuccessful plaintiff is the appellant herein.
3. This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.45 of 2010, by the learned Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram, dated 28.04.2011, wherein, the learned Judge has confirmed the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.5 of 2006, by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Parangipettai, dated 28.09.2010.
4. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to as per their litigative status before the trial Court.
5. Brief facts of the case are as follows:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.