SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2293

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
M/s. Sri Balasubramania Mills Ltd., Represented by its Manager, P. Sakthivel, Coimbatore – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Chennai & Others – Respondents
W.P. No. 1251 of 2015 & M.P. No. 1 of 2015
Decided on : 17-11-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Bharanidharan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:M. Abdul Kalam, Su. Srinivasan, Advocate.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 - Electricity Act, 2003 – Section 34 and 2(6) – Levying - Compensation for harmonics - Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari Mandamus, calling for records of respondent culminating in the impugned letter Harmonics quash the same and forbear respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants, representatives and/or any one claiming through or under them and/or or any other person from in any manner insisting on harmonic control and levying, demanding and/or collecting charges and dumping from the petitioner for their HT SC either through the CC Bills or in any other manner - Impugned Demand Notice passed by respondent, is sought to be quashed in present writ petition and a further direction is also sought to forbear respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants, representatives and/or any one claiming - Whether consumers connected to a distribution system irrespective of capacity of supply they receive including 11kv and 22kv supply lines need to provide harmonic control – Held, when this Court directed the learned Additional Solicitor General of India to get instruction whether consumers connected to a distribution system irrespective of the capacity of supply they receive including 11kv and 22kv supply lines need to provide harmonic control equipment’s, as a reply thereto, the Chief Engineer (Legal), Central Electricity Authority, Ministry of Power in his letter has clarified that the CEA Regulations, with respect to compensation on account of harmonic distortions, are applicable to only those consumers, who are connected to 33kv or namely, only bulk consumers - For better appreciation, relevant portion of said communication is extracted - Thus, for all the reasons stated, impugned demands are quashed - Consequently, writ petitions are allowed - Accordingly, the impugned demand notice is quashed and writ petition stands allowed.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent culminating in the impugned letter No. Lr.No.SE/CEDC/M/CBE/AEE-GL/AE/F.Harmonics/D.No.1354/14-15dated 9.12.2014, quash the same and forbear the 1st and 2nd respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants, representatives and/or any one claiming through or under them and/or or any other person from in any manner insisting on harmonic control and levying, demanding and/or collecting charges and compensation for harmonics dumping from the petitioner for their HT SC No.205 either through the CC Bills or in any other manner.)

1. The impugned Demand Notice passed by the 2nd respondent, dated 09.12.2014, is sought to be quashed in the present writ petition and a further direction is also sought to forbear the 1st and 2nd respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants, representatives and/or any one claiming through or under them and/or or any other person from in any manner insisting on harmonic control and levying, demanding and/or collecting charges and compensation for harmonics dumping from the petitioner for their HT SC No.205 either through the CC Bills or in any other manner.

2. The relief sought for in the present writ petition is similar to the relief sought for by the writ petitioners in a batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.25 of 2015 [M/s.S.Palaniyandi Mudaliar Memorial Hospital v. TANGEDCO], etc. and batch, which was decided by this Court on 05.06.2017.

3. The relevant paragraphs of the said order are extracted hereunder :

    “24. In view of the above, since the harmonics have several undesirable effects and affects power quality, on 21.02.2007, the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) introduced a new Regulation and accordingly, its Technical Standards for Connectivity to the Grid Regulations, 2007, came for enforcement. Applicability of the Regulations is provided in Regulation 3, which reads as under:

“3. Applicability of the Regulations – These Regulations shall be applicable to all the users, requesters, Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility.”

It is clear from the above that the said Regulation is applicable only to four categories, namely, Users, Requesters, Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility.

25. In this context, let me find out the meaning given under the CEA Regulations, 2007, for Users and Requesters. Section 2(34) defines the meaning of “User”, which is given as under:-

“2(34)-- User means a person such as, a Generating Company including captive generating plant or Transmission Licensee (other than the Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility) or Distribution Licensee or Bulk Consumer, whose electrical plant is connected to the grid at voltage level 33kv and above.” Section 2(25) defines the meaning of “Requester”, which is given as under:-

“2(25)-- Requester means a person, such as a Generating Company including captive generating plant or Transmission Licensee (excluding Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility) or Distribution Licensee or Bulk Consumer, who is seeking connection of his new or expanded electrical plant to the Grid at voltage level 33kv and above.”

A conjoint reading of the above said provisions show that a person such as, Generating Company including captive generating plant or Transmission Licensee or Distribution Licensee or Bulk Consumer, whose electrical plant is connected to the grid at voltage level 33 kv and above. Therefore, it is clear that the above said Regulations are applicable to only those consumers whose electrical plant is connected to the Grid at the voltage level of 33kv and above, hence, the petitioners, who are connected to the Grid at voltage level of 11kv/22kv supply lines, cannot be made applicable under the said Regulations.

26. Again, to be more clear, it is also pertinent to refer to Section 34 of the Electricity Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top