JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent culminating in the order bearing Lr.No.SE/PEDC/PDKTA/AEE/GL/F.Harmonics/D.No.665/14 dated 14.11.2014 issued for the petitioner's HT SC No.123, quash the same and forbear the 1st and 2nd respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants, representatives and/or any one claiming through or under them and/or any other person from in any manner levying, demanding and/or collecting harmonic compensation charges for harmonics dumping from the petitioner for their HT SC NO.123 either through the monthly High Tension Bills or in any other manner till such time that the Honourable Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) clarifies the issue in Miscellaneous Application No.126 of 2014 pending before it.)

1. The impugned Demand Notice passed by the 2nd respondent, dated 14.11.2014, is sought to be quashed in the present writ petition and a further direction is also sought to forbear the 1st and 2nd respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants, representatives and/or any one claiming through or under them and/or any other person from in any manner levying, demanding and/or collecting harmonic compensation charges for harmonics dumping from the petitioner for their HT SC NO.123 either through the monthly High Tension Bills or in any other manner till such time that the Honourable Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) clarifies the issue in Miscellaneous Application No.126 of 2014 pending before it.

2. The relief sought for in the present writ petition is similar to the relief sought for by the writ petitioners in a batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.25 of 2015 [M/s.S.Palaniyandi Mudaliar Memorial Hospital v. TANGEDCO], etc. and batch, which was decided by this Court on 05.06.2017.

3. The relevant paragraphs of the said order are extracted hereunder :

“24. In view of the above, since the harmonics have several undesirable effects and affects power quality, on 21.02.2007, the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) introduced a new Regulation and accordingly, its Technical Standards for Connectivity to the Grid Regulations, 2007, came for enforcement. Applicability of the Regulations is provided in Regulation 3, which reads as under:

“3. Applicability of the Regulations - These Regulations shall be applicable to all the users, requesters, Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility.”

It is clear from the above that the the said Regulation is applicable only to four categories, namely, Users, Requesters, Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility. 25. In this context, let me find out the meaning given under the CEA Regulations, 2007, for Users and Requesters. Section 2(34) defines the meaning of “User”, which is given as under:-

“2(34)-- User means a person such as, a Generating Company including captive generating plant or Transmission Licensee (other than the Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility) or Distribution Licensee or Bulk Consumer, whose electrical plant is connected to the grid at voltage level 33kv and above.” Section 2(25) defines the meaning of “Requester”, which is given as under:-

“2(25)-- Requester means a person, such as a Generating Company including captive generating plant or Transmission Licensee (excluding Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility) or Distribution Licensee or Bulk Consumer, who is seeking connection of his new or expanded electrical plant to the Grid at voltage level 33kv and above.”

A conjoint reading of the above said provisions show that a person such as, Generating Company including captive generating plant or Transmission Licensee or Distribution Licensee or Bulk Consumer, whose electrical plant is connected to the grid at voltage level 33 kv and above. Therefore, it is clear that the above said Regulations are applicable to only those consum