SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2312

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
M. Yogalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Housing Board – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P. Haribabu.
For the Respondent: R. Bharath Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to refund the forfeited amount of Rs. 1 lakh, which was paid as ‘deposit’ in respect of “Flat No. H.40/F2 in 102 H.I.G. Scheme at Thiruvanmiyur Extension” which was allotted to petitioner's (late) husband or alternatively a Flat may be allotted for the same cost after adjusting the deposit of Rs. 1/- Lakh available with the respondents - in the vicinity of the flat already allotted to him.

1. The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the 1st respondent to refund the forfeited amount of Rs. 1 lakh which was paid as ‘deposit’ in respect of “Flat No. H.40/F2 in 102 H.I.G. Scheme at Thiruvanmiyur Extension” which was allotted to petitioner's (late) husband or alternatively a Flat may be allotted for the same cost after adjusting the deposit of Rs. 1/- Lakh available with the respondents in the vicinity of the flat already allotted to him.

2. The petitioner states that her husband Late Mr. K. Muthuvel was working in the Police Department and retired as Additional Superintendent of Police and died o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top