IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
The General Secretary, Public Health Department Officials Association – Petitioner
Versus
The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Chennai – Respondent
W.P. No. 5623 of 2011, M.P. Nos. 2 of 2011, 1 of 2013
Decided On : 12-11-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus - Petitioner states that petitioner-Association is a Registered Society under Societies Registration Act and said registration is intact - Recognition granted by Government alone was cancelled based on certain false allegations – Held, recognition of an Association by Government is a privilege granted and very purpose and object of such recognition by Government under Recognition Rules is to provide an opportunity to such recognised Associations to represent grievances of members of Association - In absence of any such recognition, Association may not be in a position to redress their grievances in name of Association - Based on certain allegations, recognition was cancelled - On account of efflux of time and due to various developments during pendency of writ petition for past about ten years, petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh application before first respondent for grant of recognition under Association Recognition Rules - In event of filing any such application, first respondent may consider same and decide issues on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible - Writ petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in G.O.Ms. No. 128, dated 13.09.2010 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction.
1. The writ on hand has been instituted to quash G.O.Ms. No. 128, dated 13.09.2010 and to direct the respondents not to interfere with the internal affairs of the petitioner-Association.
2. The order impugned passed by the first respondent reveals that the recognition granted by the Government in favour of the petitioner-Association was cancelled in the year 2010.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner-Association is a Registered Society under the Societies Registration Act and the said registration is intact. The recognition granted by the Government alone was cancelled based on certain false allegations.
4. This Court is of the considered opinion that recognition of an Association by the Government is a privilege granted and the very purpose and the object of such recognition by the Government under the Recognition Rules is to provide an opportunity to such recognised Associations to represent the grievances of the members of the Association. In the absence of any such recognition, the Association may not be in a position to redress their grievances in the name of the Association. Thus, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the order of cancellation is to be set aside.
5. This Court is of the considered opinion that based on certain allegations, the recognition was cancelled.
6. The counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the first respondent, more specifically, states as follows:
7. As per the directions of this Court, the Government have sent a notice on 08.03.2010 (vide the Government Letter No. 5065/K1/2010-1, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (K) Department to the General Secretary of the above Association, for requesting to state the reason for not convening the Special General Body Meeting as requested by the members of the Association, within seven days from the date of receipt of notice. The General Secretary of the said Association has requested two weeks time for giving the reply to the above notice to the Government.
8. The petitioner-Association has taken much more time to conduct Special General Body Meeting. The Government issued another notice on 05.05.2010 vide the Government Letter No. 5065/K1/2010-4, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (K) Department, requesting to conduct the Special General Body Meeting, within ten days and send the results of the Meeting.
9. The petitioner-Association has sent a letter on 10.05.2010 stating that the Meeting will be conducted on 21st and 22nd August 2010. Again they have written a letter to the Government dated 07.06.2010 stating that they are arranging to conduct the Meeting of the Association.
10.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.