JUDGMENT :

Paresh Upadhyay, J.

(Prayer: Appeal preferred under Clause XV of Letters Patent against the order dated 26.07.2021 made in W.P.No.37242 of 2005.)

1. Challenge in this appeal is made by the workman to the order dated 26 July 2021 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.No.37242 of 2005, allowing the writ petition filed by the Management -State Road Transport Corporation.

2. Heard the learned advocates.

3. Learned advocate for the appellant (workman) has submitted that, interference by learned Single Judge in the award passed by the Labour Court was not justified, since the Labour Court had, on the basis of the evidence placed on record arrived at the conclusion that, discontinuance of service of the workman was illegal and relief was granted. It is submitted that in the writ petition filed by the Management, learned Single Judge set aside the award inter alia on the ground that the workman had caused accidental death, he was not regular employee and under the wrong premise that the documents are available with the Management, the employee filed the petition and obtained adverse finding against him. It is submitted that the award of the Labour Court could not have been interfered