JUDGMENT :

S. Vaidyanathan, R. Vijayakumar, JJ.

(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 26.06.2014 made in W.P.No.15545 of 2014 and thereby allow the Writ Appeal.)

The issue involved in this case is trivial in nature.

To be more precise, can an act, done in a reversely order against an established state, be justified or approved?

“A reversal is just anything that is a surprise.

It is a way of keeping the audience interested” -

Tony Gilroy, an American Filmmaker.

The degree of the Writ petitioner can be compared to a Tamil Proverb

“TAMIL”

This Writ Appeal has been filed by the Appellants for setting aside the order of the learned Single Judge dated 26.06.2014 made in W.P.No.15545 of 2014, in and by which, the Respondents were directed to approve the appointment of the 1st Respondent herein as B.T.Assistant in the 2nd Respondent school.

2. For the sake of brevity, the parties would be referred to by their original nomenclature found in the Writ Petition as 'the Writ Petitioner', 'Appellants/Respondents 1 and 2' and 'the School/R3'.

3. It was the case of the Writ Petitioner that he came out successful in the 10th Standard during the year 1984 and