SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2717

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.N. PRAKASH, R. HEMALATHA, JJ.
Petitioner
Versus
Respondent
Criminal Contempt Petition No. 1699 of 2021
Decided On : 21-12-2021

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 - Information Technology Act, 2000 – Video clipping showing online Court proceedings of one of Judges, in which, a male is found engaged in eroticism with a lady, is going viral in social media - Court cannot afford to be a mute spectator and turn a Nelson's eye when such brazen vulgarity is publicly displayed amidst Court proceedings - Held, It is high time that we revisit procedure of conducting Court proceedings in hybrid mode, especially in light of fact that Advocates, in large numbers, have started appearing in person in High Court as well in District Courts - However, a decision in this regard has to be taken by Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice before whom this matter may be placed.

JUDGMENT :-

A video clipping showing the online Court proceedings of one of our brother Judges, in which, a male is found engaged in eroticism with a lady, is going viral in social media. This Court cannot afford to be a mute spectator and turn a Nelson's eye when such brazen vulgarity is publicly displayed amidst Court proceedings.

2. Ergo, we take cognizance of the impugned video clipping for initiating suo motu criminal contempt proceedings and issue the following directions:

The Registry shall register a suo motu criminal contempt proceedings based on the impugned video clipping and place the matter before us on the next date of hearing;

Since the impugned video clipping prima facie discloses the commission of cognizable offences under the Information Technology Act and other penal laws, the CB-CID shall register a suo motu FIR on the impugned video clipping and file a preliminary report before this Court on 23.12.2021 (Thursday) naming the dramatis personae who are found engaged in the vulgar activity;

The Registry shall preserve the video recordings of the Court proceedings in question;

The Registrar (I.T.-cum-Statistics) shall coordinate with CB-CID and if required, furnish the impugned video clipping and other evidences in this regard, to the CB-CID;

The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, shall take steps to block the circulation of the impugned video clipping in the social media.

The Registrar (I.T.-cum-Statistics) shall take steps to liaise with the authorities concerned for removal of the impugned video clipping from the internet.

3. Superadded, we are of the considered view that it is high time that we revisit the procedure of conducting Court proceedings in hybrid mode, especially in the light of the fact that Advocates, in large numbers, have started appearing in person in our High Court as well in the District Courts. However, a decision in this regard has to be taken by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice before whom this matter may be placed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top