SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2687

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gobichettipalayam Sub Division, Erode – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 434 of 2019 & Crl.M.P. No. 14774 of 2019
Decided On : 23-12-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :T. Muruganantham, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Sugendran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 498A and 306 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374(2), 174, 174(3) and 207 - Evidence Act - Section 113-A – Offence of Cruelty and Committed suicide – Appeal against conviction - Whether prosecution has established charge against accused for offence punishable under Section 498A and 306 IPC beyond all reasonable doubts - Whether Trial Court is right in convicting appellant for offence as stated above - Deceased and accused were working together and they fell in love with each other and got married in Temple, after marriage, they were living with parents of accused at Door - Out of wedlock, they have a child aged 4 years - Unable to tolerate harassment, deceased had decided to commit suicide - Held, Cruelty” under Section 498-A IPC need any wilful conduct which is of such nature as is likely to drive a woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to her life or person. Such a wilful conduct should be of such nature as would provoke a person of common prudence to commit suicide. Difference of opinion within a family on everyday mundane matters would not fall within such category - prosecution has to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had instigated, conspired or intentionally aided so as to drive the wife to commit suicide and that the presumption under Section 113-A of Evidence Act is only permissive and not mandatory - Court finds that prosecution has not proved beyond all doubts charges for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 306 IPC against appellant by letting any legal and cogent evidence to establish that he had abetted his wife to commit suicide - Therefore, appellant is entitled to benefit of doubt and thereby, he is entitled to be acquitted - Criminal Appeal is allowed.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Crl.P.C. against the judgment dated 22.2.2017 passed in S.C.No.149 of 2016 by the Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode.)

1. The Criminal Appeal has been filed challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 22.2.2017 rendered by the Court of Sessions, Mahalir Neethimandram (FTC), Erode.

2. The conviction and sentence imposed against the appellant are as under:

3. The case of the prosecution is as under:-

    (i) The deceased Mahadevi and the accused were working together and they fell in love with each other and got married on 18.11.2010 in Bhagavathi Amman Temple, Gobichettipalayam. After the marriage, they were living with the parents of the accused at Door No.19/7, Ganguwar Street, Modachur, Gobichettipalaym. Out of the wedlock, they have a child aged 4 years named Kaushik.

(ii) The accused had initially gone to work in a Company at Thiruppur and thereafter, he became addicted to alcohol and did not go for work. Therefore, there were frequent wordy quarrels between the husband and wife. Two months prior to the occurrence, the accused frequently consumed alcohol and did not go for work. When it was questioned by the deceased, the accused scolded her and picked up wordy quarrel with her and harassed her. The deceased, unable to tolerate the harassment of the accused, attempted to commit suicide by hanging by locking the door of the room in the house and the accused had climbed the roof, removed the tiles, went into the room and saved the life of the deceased Mahadevi. Even thereafter, the accused continued with his drinking habit and did not go for work. When it was questioned by Mahadevi, there used to be quarrel.

(iii) On 16.6.2016, in the morning hours, the deceased Mahadevi had requested the accused to go for work. Infuriated by that, the accused got angry with Mahadevi and harassed her and had abused her by saying that “you are shouting at me”. He had scolded her by saying that since she was alive, she was shouting at him to go for work and if only she really hangs to death like the earlier attempt, he would be peaceful and that he had asked her to die by hanging. Unable to tolerate the harassment, the deceased Mahadevi had decided to commit suicide and in between 10.00 pm on 16.6.2016 and 4.00 am on 17.6.2016, she had committed suicide by hanging with her saree in the cross beam of the house situated at Door No.19/7, Ganguwar Street, Modachur owned by the accused.

(iv) On intimation about the suicide, PW9, Ravikumar, Village Administrative Officer gave a complaint Ex.P9 to the respondent police on 17.6.2016 at 9.00 hours.

(v) Based on the complaint, PW10 registered a case in Crime No.427 of 2016, Ex.P10 under Section 174 Cr.P.C and forwarded copies of the FIR to the Sub Collector, PW7 and to PW16, Deputy Superintendent of Police.

(vi) PW11, Grade I Constable handed over copies of the FIR to the Sub Collector and the Deputy Superintendent of Police.

(vii) PW16, Deputy Superintendent of Police received the FIR and took up the investigation of this case and went to the scene of occurrence at 10.30 am and in the presence of witnesses PW13 and another person, prepared the observation mahazar, Ex.P12 and rough sketch Ex.P15 and recovered Saree M.O.1 which was partly burnt, in the presence of the witnesses and recorded the statement of the witnesses. He also enquired the witnesses PW9-Ravikumar, PW1-Amutha, PW5-Soniya, PW13-Murugan and other witnesses and recorded their statements. On the same day, he also directed the photographer PW3 to take photographs. PW3, took 5 photographs and converted them into a CD, E.P1 series. PW16, thereafter, enquired the witnesses and recorded their statements.

(viii) On 17.6.2016, at 6.00 pm, PW14 woman constable Rukmani, recovered the clothes of the deceased M.O.s 2 to 7 and handed over in the police station. PW16 had seized the same under Form 91 from PW14 and sent them to the Judicial Magistrate on 18.6.2016.

(ix) Mea

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top