SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2654

S.VAIDYANATHAN, G.JAYACHANDRAN
New India Assurance Company Ltd. , Kumbakonam – Appellant
Versus
Mahamayee Ammal – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :J.S. Murali, Advocate.
For the Respondents:A.V. Arun, C. Meenakshi Rama Prabhu, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :-

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree in M.C.O.P.No.50 of 2012 dated 31.03.2015 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur.

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree in M.C.O.P.No.51 of 2012 dated 31.03.2015 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur.

Cross Objection filed under Order XLI r/w Rule 22 of C.P.C. to enhance the award amount granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur in M.C.O.P.No. 50 of 2012 dated 31.03.2015 and dismiss the appeal filed by the Appellant/Respondent No.1 in C.M.A.(MD) No.1054 of 2015

Cross Objection filed under Order XLI r/w Rule 22 of C.P.C. to enhance the award amount granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Virudhu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top