SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 57

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
B. Lakshmipathi – Appellant
Versus
Colorhome Developers Private Limited, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :R. Rajaramani, Advocate.
For the Respondent:V. Manohar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Arbitration Original Petition filed under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate and resolve the dispute between the petitioner and respondent in terms of the Construction Agreement dated 31.03.2017.

1. This Arbitration Original Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator under the Construction Agreement dated 31.03.2017, entered into between the petitioner and the respondent.

2. There seems to be some disputes between the parties. There is an Arbitration Clause under the Construction Agreement dated 31.03.2017, which is extracted under:

    “14. ARBITRATION:

14.1 All disputes, controversies or differences which may arise between the parties herein out of or in relation to or in connection with this agreement, the interpretation thereof, or its breach that have not been resolved between the parties by mutual discussions shall be referred to arbitration. The venue of the arbitration shall be CHENNAI and the proceedings shall be English language and in accordance with and subject to the provisions of the Arbitration and Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top