PARESH UPADHYAY, SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
R. Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
Chairman & Managing Director, Tamilnadu Housing Board, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Paresh Upadhyay, J.
1. Challenge in this appeal is made to the order dated 6 December 2021 passed by learned single Judge recorded on W.P.No.7577 of 2012. This appeal is by the original writ petitioner.
2. The prayer clause in the writ petition reads as under:-
3. Learned single Judge has not accepted any of these two prayers and has held that no interference is required in the order of the respondents - Housing Board ordering eviction of the original writ petitioner from the property.
4. Learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that the appellant had invested huge amount of about Rs.30 lakhs for repairing/ constructing the property in the plot, which he had received from his father. The appellant has retired from Government service
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.